IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 03

Published on: March 2026 2026

CORRELATION BETWEEN THE 1‐MINUTE SIT-TO‐STAND TEST AND 6‐MINUTE WALK TEST IN HEALTHY YOUNG ADULTS

Khushi Dasi Ancy Vincent

Dr. Medha Deo

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Background: The 6-min walk test (6 MWT) is widely used to assess submaximal aerobic capacity; however, it requires a long corridor and considerable time to administer. The 1-min sit-to-stand test (1 MSTS) has been proposed as a quick and space-efficient alternative for evaluating functional exercise capacity. This study aimed to examine the performance of healthy young adults on the 1 MSTS test and determine its correlation with the 6 MWT distance.


Methods: Ninety healthy volunteers aged 18–25 years participated in this cross-sectional study. Participants underwent one 6-MWT and one 1-MSTS test on a standard chair with arms crossed, in accordance with the American Thoracic Society guidelines. Dyspnea and leg fatigue were rated using the Borg CR-10 scale before and after each test. The association between 1 MSTS test repetitions and 6 MWT distance was assessed using Spearman’s correlation. Gender differences and the relationship between age and test outcomes were also analyzed.


Results: The participants completed an average of 49 ± 8 sit-to-stand repetitions and walked 618 ± 85 m during the 6 MWT. A moderate positive correlation was observed between 1 MSTS test repetitions and 6 MWT distance (ρ ≈ 0.65, p < 0.001). Men performed slightly better than women in both tests, whereas age within the 18–25-year range showed no significant association with performance.


Conclusion: The 1-minute sit-to-stand test showed a moderate association with the 6-minute walk test in healthy young adults and may serve as a practical alternative for assessing functional exercise capacity when the 6 min walk test is not feasible.

How to Cite this Paper

Dasi, K. & Vincent, A. (2026). Correlation Between the 1‐Minute Sit-to‐Stand Test and 6‐Minute Walk Test in Healthy Young Adults. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(03). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i3.127

Dasi, Khushi, and Ancy Vincent. "Correlation Between the 1‐Minute Sit-to‐Stand Test and 6‐Minute Walk Test in Healthy Young Adults." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 03, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i3.127.

Dasi, Khushi, and Ancy Vincent. "Correlation Between the 1‐Minute Sit-to‐Stand Test and 6‐Minute Walk Test in Healthy Young Adults." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 03 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i3.127.

Search & Index

References


  1. Fleg, J. L., Piña, I. L., Balady, G. J., Chaitman, B. R., Fletcher, B., Lavie, C. J., Limacher, M. C., & Stein, R. A. (2000). Assessment of functional capacity in clinical and research settings.Circulation, 102(13), 1591–1597. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.102.13.1591

  2. Balady, G. J., Arena, R., Sietsema, K., Myers, J., Coke, L., Fletcher, G. F., Forman, D., Franklin, B., Guazzi, M., Gulati, M., Keteyian, S. J., Lavie, C. J., Macko, R., Mancini, D., & Milani, R. V. (2010). Clinician’s guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults.Circulation, 122(2), 191–225. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192520

  3. Wasserman, K., Hansen, J. E., Sue, D. Y., Stringer, W. W., & Whipp, B. J. (2012).Principles of exercise testing and interpretation (5th ed.). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.

  4. ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. (2002). ATS statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 166(1), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102

  5. Bittner, V., Weiner, D. H., Yusuf, S., Rogers, W. J., McIntyre, K. M., Bangdiwala, S. I., Kronenberg, M. W., Kostis, J. B., Kohn, R. M., & Guillotte, M. (1993). Prediction of mortality and morbidity with a 6-minute walk test in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.JAMA, 270(14), 1702–1707.

  6. Enright, P. L., & Sherrill, D. L. (1998). Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 158(5), 1384–1387. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.158.5.9710086

  7. Strassmann, A., Steurer-Stey, C., Lana, K. D., Zoller, M., Turk, A. J., Suter, P., & Puhan, M. A. (2013). Population-based reference values for the 1-minute sit-to-stand test.International Journal of Public Health, 58(6), 949–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-013-0504-y

  8. Bohannon, R. W. (1995). Sit-to-stand test for measuring performance of lower extremity muscles.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80(1), 163–166. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1995.80.1.163

  9. Borg, G. (1982). Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 14(5), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012

  10. Crook, S., Büsching, G., Schultz, K., Lehbert, N., Jelusic, D., Keusch, S., Wittmann, M., Schuler, M., Radtke, T., & Frey, M. (2017). A multicenter validation of the 1-min sit-to-stand test in patients with COPD.European Respiratory Journal, 49(3), 1601871.https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01871-2016

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: Mar 25 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top