Published on: April 2026
DIGITAL EXCLUSION AS A VIOLATION OF THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION: AN AMBEDKARITE CRITIQUE OF THE MODERN DIGITAL DIVIDE
Prof. Prashant Vithal Kadam
Article Status
Available Documents
Abstract
The paper examines the contemporary phenomenon of the "Digital Divide" not merely as a technological gap, but as a systemic socio-legal barrier that threatens the fundamental Right to Education (Article 21A). Drawing upon the emancipatory philosophy of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, who envisioned education as the "milk of a tigress" and the primary tool for social transformation, this study argues that digital exclusion in the 21st century constitutes a new form of structural inequality. In the wake of the rapid digitalization of pedagogy—accelerated by global shifts toward hybrid learning—access to high-speed internet and digital infrastructure has become a prerequisite for academic participation. However, data from the National Sample Survey (NSS) and recent TRAI reports (2025–2026) reveal a persistent "Silicon Gap" between urban centres and rural hinterlands, and across caste and class hierarchies. By applying Ambedkar’s critique of social stratification, this paper posits that denying digital access to marginalized communities is synonymous with the historical denial of physical entry into classrooms. It equates digital illiteracy to a modern state of "information untouchability" that restricts the "Global Perspective" of law and society to a privileged few.
How to Cite this Paper
Kadam, P. V. (2026). Digital Exclusion as a Violation of the Right to Education: An Ambedkarite Critique of the Modern Digital Divide. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(04). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.528
Kadam, Prashant. "Digital Exclusion as a Violation of the Right to Education: An Ambedkarite Critique of the Modern Digital Divide." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 04, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.528.
Kadam, Prashant. "Digital Exclusion as a Violation of the Right to Education: An Ambedkarite Critique of the Modern Digital Divide." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 04 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.528.
References
- Alexander, B. (2017) "Going Digital: The Transformation of Higher Education," Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 435–452, Taylor & Francis.
- Ambedkar, B.R. (2014) "Annihilation of Caste," The Annotated Critical Edition, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 201–315, Navayana Publishing.
- DiMaggio, P. and Hargittai, E. (2001) "From the 'Digital Divide' to 'Digital Inequality': Studying Utilization Rather Than Access," Princeton University Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies Working Papers, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 1–32, Princeton University.
- Fuchs, C. (2009) "The Role of Income Inequality in a Multivariate Cross-National Analysis of the Digital Divide," Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 41–58, SAGE Publications.
- Guru, G. and Sarukkai, S. (2012) "The Cracked Mirror: An Indian Debate on Experience and Theory," Journal of Social Epistemology, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 115–128, Oxford University Press.
- Hargittai, E. (2002) "Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills," First Monday, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 1–15, University of Illinois Chicago.
- Jaffrelot, C. (2005) "Dr. Ambedkar and Untouchability: Analyzing Caste in Modern India," Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 752–754, Columbia University Press.
- Livingstone, S. and Helsper, E.J. (2007) "Gradations in Digital Inclusion: Children, Young People and the Digital Divide," New Media & Society, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 671–696, SAGE Publications.
- Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C.J., and Stansbury, M. (2003) "Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide," Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 143–155, Georgetown University Press.
- Omvedt, G. (2004) "Ambedkar: Towards an Enlightened India," Contemporary South Asia, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 341–343, Penguin Viking.
Ethical Compliance & Review Process
- •All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
- •Review follows editorial policy.
- •Authors retain copyright.
- •Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
- •Published on: Apr 20 2026
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

