IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 04

Published on: April 2026

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ARIMA AND LSTM ARCHITECTURES FOR URBAN AIR QUALITY PREDICTION: A 2024–2025 CASE STUDY OF DELHI- NCR

Priya Tyagi Anupama Pandey Harsh Chaudhary Ankit Mishra Ashish Yadav

Department of Computer Science and Engineering (AI&ML) Nitra Technical Campus Raj Nagar Ghaziabad UP India

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Air pollution is one of the most critical environmental challenges facing modern urban centers, with the Air Quality Index (AQI) serving as a vital metric for public health management and municipal governance. This research provides an exhaustive investigation into the two primary paradigms of time-series forecasting for environmental data: the statistical Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) and the deep learning-based Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network. While ARIMA offers a robust, interpretable framework for linear patterns through the Box-Jenkins methodology, LSTM architectures excel at capturing the complex, non- linear dependencies characteristic of atmospheric pollutants over extended sequences. Using a high-resolution dataset from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and meteorological ERA5 reanalysis for Delhi-NCR (2019–2025), we evaluate these models across diverse seasonal cycles. Results indicate that while ARIMA is computationally efficient for short-term, stable trends, the LSTM model achieves a significantly higher R^2 score (0.96) during extreme pollution events, such as the "Severe Plus" episode of November 2024 and the sustained hazardous spikes of October 2025. This paper aims to establish a benchmark for selecting the appropriate predictive architecture to support early-warning systems like the Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP).

 Keywords: Air Quality Index (AQI), Time Series Forecasting, Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Deep Learning, Machine Learning, Environmental Prediction, PM2.5, Urban Air Pollution, Delhi-NCR, ERA5 Reanalysis, Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP), Non-linear Modeling, Spatiotemporal Analysis.

How to Cite this Paper

Tyagi, P., Pandey, A., Chaudhary, H., Mishra, A. & Yadav, A. (2026). Comparative Analysis of ARIMA and LSTM Architectures for Urban Air Quality Prediction: A 2024–2025 Case Study of Delhi- NCR. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(04). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.969

Tyagi, Priya, et al.. "Comparative Analysis of ARIMA and LSTM Architectures for Urban Air Quality Prediction: A 2024–2025 Case Study of Delhi- NCR." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 04, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.969.

Tyagi, Priya,Anupama Pandey,Harsh Chaudhary,Ankit Mishra, and Ashish Yadav. "Comparative Analysis of ARIMA and LSTM Architectures for Urban Air Quality Prediction: A 2024–2025 Case Study of Delhi- NCR." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 04 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.969.

Search & Index

References


  • World Health Organization, WHO Ambient Air Quality Database, 2022 Update: Status Report. Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.

  • E. P. Box and G. M. Jenkins, Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. San Francisco, CA, USA: Holden-Day, 1970.

  • Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), National Air Quality Index (NAQI) Calculation Methodology and Breakpoints. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, 2014.

  • Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, “Long Short-Term Memory,” Neural Computation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735–1780, 1997.

  • Hersbach et al., “The ERA5 global reanalysis,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 146, no. 730, pp. 1999–2049, 2020.

  • Sidhu et al., “Predictive modelling of AQI across various cities and states in India: Impact of stubble burning,” International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 2024.

  • Ansari and A. R. Quaff, “Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for Precise Hourly Air Quality Index Prediction in Azamgarh, India,” International Journal of Environmental Research, 2024.

  • Atoui et al., “Evaluating AQI levels using Naïve models, Exponential Smoothing, TBATS, and SARIMA in Lebanon,” Environmental Monitoring Studies, 2022.

  • Mao et al., “Modeling Air Quality Prediction Using a Deep Learning Approach,” Journal of Environmental Science, 2021.

  • Sharma, S. Khurana et al., “Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques in Air Quality Index (AQI) Prediction in Smart Cities,” International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2024.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: May 01 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top