Published on: April 2026
SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING AS A TOOL FOR ENHANCING TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Vishal Verma
Dr. Geetika Tandon Kapoor
Article Status
Available Documents
Abstract
Sustainability reporting has emerged as one of the most significant tools through which corporations communicate their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance (Ronayne et al., 2020) to a diverse array of stakeholders (Ronayne et al., 2020). This paper undertakes an examination of how sustainability reporting functions as a mechanism for enhancing transparency and accountability within the broader framework of corporate governance. Drawing entirely on secondary data sources including peer-reviewed academic journals, global reporting surveys, regulatory documents, and institutional reports. The study traces the historical evolution of sustainability reporting from voluntary philanthropy-based disclosures to the current era of mandatory, assurance-backed ESG frameworks such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) (Odhiambo et al., n.d.), Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), and the newly introduced International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) (Odhiambo et al., n.d.) standards.
How to Cite this Paper
Verma, V. (2026). Sustainability Reporting as a Tool For Enhancing Transparency and Accountability in Corporate Governance. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(04). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.1034
Verma, Vishal. "Sustainability Reporting as a Tool For Enhancing Transparency and Accountability in Corporate Governance." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 04, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.1034.
Verma, Vishal. "Sustainability Reporting as a Tool For Enhancing Transparency and Accountability in Corporate Governance." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 04 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.1034.
References
- Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2014). The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(4), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1767
- (2024). Proposed Australian sustainability reporting standards: Exposure draft. Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. https://www.auasb.gov.au
- Berg, F., Koelbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033
- Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1036–1071. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2012-00998
- Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. Harper & Row.
- Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., & Lessidrenska, T. (2009). The rise of the Global Reporting Initiative: A case of institutional entrepreneurship. Environmental Politics, 18(2), 182–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802682551
- Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039903800303
- Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009
- Cho, C. H., Roberts, R. W., & Patten, D. M. (2012). The language of US corporate environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(4), 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.10.002
- (2023). CDP annual report 2022. Carbon Disclosure Project. https://www.cdp.net
Ethical Compliance & Review Process
- •All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
- •Review follows editorial policy.
- •Authors retain copyright.
- •Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
- •Published on: May 01 2026
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

