IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 05

Published on: May 2026

EFFECT OF CLASSROOM SEATING ARRANGEMENTS ON STUDENT PARTICIPATION

Mukul Varshney Ayasha Siddiqui Kunal Tiwari Vinay Gupta

Invertis University Bareilly Uttar Pradesh

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Classroom seating arrangements play a crucial role in the learning environment, yet they are often underestimated in their impact on student participation in higher education (Srivastava & Gupta, 2019). As the focus shifts towards student-cantered learning, it becomes essential for educators to comprehend how the physical setup of a classroom can affect participation, interaction, and engagement. This research investigates the influence of seating arrangements on student participation by employing basic statistical methods like correlation, regression, and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The study emphasizes key factors such as seating configurations, student interaction, and classroom engagement. Recent studies suggest that seating layouts significantly affect students' attention, communication, and participation (Seet et al., 2022; Wasendorf et al., 2023). Arrangements that encourage interaction, such as clusters and circular setups, are more effective in fostering engagement and participation compared to traditional row-based seating (Haya, 2025; Kumar et al., 2026). Moreover, seating designs that enhance proximity and visibility improve peer interactions, leading to greater student involvement (Gao et al., 2021). The results indicate that seating arrangements have a notable positive impact on student participation and are closely linked to student interaction. Classroom engagement also plays a significant role in influencing participation. Additionally, notable differences in participation levels were found among various seating arrangements, with interactive layouts proving to be more effective. The study concludes that seating arrangements are a crucial pedagogical element that can boost student participation when integrated with interactive teaching methods. By implementing flexible seating strategies, educators can foster more engaging and inclusive learning environments for students.

Keywords: Classroom seating arrangement, student participation, student interaction, classroom engagement, learning environment, higher education

How to Cite this Paper

Varshney, M., Siddiqui, A., Tiwari, K. & Gupta, V. (2026). Effect of Classroom Seating Arrangements on Student Participation. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(05). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.243

Varshney, Mukul, et al.. "Effect of Classroom Seating Arrangements on Student Participation." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 05, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.243.

Varshney, Mukul,Ayasha Siddiqui,Kunal Tiwari, and Vinay Gupta. "Effect of Classroom Seating Arrangements on Student Participation." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 05 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.243.

Search & Index

References


  1. Chandra, S., & Gupta, M. (2024). Effect of Polychronicity, Functional Flexibility, Work Engagement and Job Embeddedness on Employee Performance- A PLS-SEM Approach. Revista Electronica de Veterinaria, 25(2), 1619-1630.

  2. Dalka, A., Singh, R., & Verma, P. (2022). Measuring student engagement using Likert scale instruments: A methodological review. Educational Measurement Review, 10(2), 55–68.

  3. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

  4. Gao, Y., Zhang, L., & Franklin, T. (2021). Designing classroom spaces to enhance student engagement: Evidence from higher education. Learning Environments Research, 24(2), 189–205.

  5. Gaur, M. S., & Gupta, M. (2023). Determinants of digital promotion influencing students ‘choice of college: a comprehensive analysis. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing3(1).

  6. Gaur, S., Gupta, M., & Sharma, K. (2024). An Empirical Study on Digital Marketing Determinants Affecting Students' College Selection. Library of Progress-Library Science, Information Technology & Computer44(3).

  7. Ghimire, N., Bista, K., & Shrestha, S. (2024). Survey-based research in education: Data collection and reliability considerations. Education Sciences, 14(3), 102–118.

  8. Gupta, M. (2013). A study of brand preference and consumption pattern of beer in Bareilly. Indian Journal of Marketing, 34-48.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: May 08 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top