IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 05

Published on: May 2026

CAPFENCE: REDUCING COMPUTATIONAL OVERHEAD IN AGENTIC AI VIA SELECTIVE AUTHENTICATED DELEGATION

Anjali Srivastava Piyush Gupta

Payal Gulati

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

J.C. Bose University of Science and Technology YMCA Faridabad India

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Agentic AI systems are increasingly ca-pable of executing multi-step plans, in-voking external tools, browsing the web, and modifying persistent state with lim-ited human supervision. This capability expansion introduces a critical yet un-deraddressed security challenge: by what authority does an agent act, and how can that authority be enforced efficiently at runtime? Current approaches to delega-tion safety are either static and brittle (allowlist-based access control), computa-tionally prohibitive (always-on large lan-guage model monitoring), or retrospec-tive and non-preventive (logging-only au-diting). None is suitable for the resource-constrained environments—edge devices, on-device copilots, bandwidth-limited en-terprise endpoints—where agentic sys-tems are rapidly being deployed.

This paper proposes CapFence, a lightweight runtime delegation layer that addresses this gap through four tightly integrated components: (i) a capabil-ity compiler that translates natural-language intent into structured, least-privilege capability tokens; (ii) a com-pact risk gate that scores each pro-posed action using a low-cost calibrated model; (iii) a selective escalation mecha-nism that reserves expensive verification for genuinely ambiguous actions; and

(iv) a compressed audit chain that sup-ports retrospective accountability with-out verbose trace retention. Motivated by the authenticated-delegation prob-lem articulated by South et al. [1] and the deployment-visibility tradeoffs doc-umented by Chan et al. [2], CapFence targets simultaneous reductions in de-cision latency (≈75%), token cost over-head (≈77%), false-positive rate (≈46%), and peak memory footprint relative to an always-on LLM monitor, while re-taining task success on the GAIA, We-bArena, Mind2Web, VisualWebArena, and AgentBench benchmark suites. The primary contribution is a governance primitive that makes least-privilege del-egation both principled and practically deployable.

Keywords: Agentic AI, authenticated delegation, runtime gating, capability to-kens, selective escalation, auditability, edge deployment.

How to Cite this Paper

Srivastava, A. & Gupta, P. (2026). CapFence: Reducing Computational Overhead in Agentic AI via Selective Authenticated Delegation. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(05). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.326

Srivastava, Anjali, and Piyush Gupta. "CapFence: Reducing Computational Overhead in Agentic AI via Selective Authenticated Delegation." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 05, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.326.

Srivastava, Anjali, and Piyush Gupta. "CapFence: Reducing Computational Overhead in Agentic AI via Selective Authenticated Delegation." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 05 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.326.

Search & Index

References


  1. South, S. Marro, T. Hardjono, R. Ma-hari, C. D. Whitney, A. Chan, and A. Pent-land, “Position: AI Agents Need Authen-ticated Delegation,” in Proc. 42nd Int. Conf. Machine Learning (ICML), PMLR, vol. 267, pp. 82211–82231, 2025.

  2. Chan, C. Ezell, M. Kaufmann, K. Wei,Hammond, H. Bradley, E. Bluemke,Rajkumar, D.  Krueger,      N.  Kolt,Heim, and M. Anderljung, “Visibil-ity into AI Agents,” in Proc. ACM Conf. Fairness, Accountability, and Trans-parency (FAccT), pp. 958–973, 2024. doi:10.1145/3630106.3658948

  3. C. Phiri, “Creating Characteristically Auditable Agentic AI Systems,” in Proc. Intelligent Robotics FAIR 2025 (IntRob ’25), 2025. doi:10.1145/3759355.3759356

  4. Yao, J. Zhao,  D. Yu,  I. Shafran,R. Narasimhan, and Y. Cao, “Re-Act: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models,” in FMDM@NeurIPS, 2022.

  5. Schick et al., “Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools,” 2023.

  6. Madaan et al., “Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback,” 2023.

  7. Liu et al., “AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents,” in ICLR 2024.

  8. Mialon et al., “GAIA: A Benchmark for General AI Assistants,” in ICLR 2024.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: May 10 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top