Published on: May 2026
DYNAMICS OF SUSTAINABLE VENTURE SCALING: STRATEGIC ADAPTATION, RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS, AND LONG-TERM GROWTH OUTCOMES
Dr. Milan Patel
Dr. Sonam Choephel, Dr. Reeti Pandya
Article Status
Available Documents
Abstract
Sustainable entrepreneurship has emerged as a critical pathway for addressing pressing environmental and societal challenges through innovation-driven market mechanisms. Despite their transformative potential, many sustainability-oriented ventures encounter significant difficulties in achieving scalable growth beyond the nascent stages of development, thereby constraining their long-term socio-economic impact. While prior studies have predominantly concentrated on venture creation, innovation processes, and entrepreneurial intent, limited empirical attention has been devoted to understanding the multidimensional determinants of venture scaling. Accordingly, this study investigates the extent to which strategic orientation, innovation capability, financial resource accessibility, stakeholder collaboration, and institutional conditions influence scaling outcomes within sustainable enterprises
How to Cite this Paper
Patel, M. (2026). Dynamics of Sustainable Venture Scaling: Strategic Adaptation, Resource Constraints, and Long-Term Growth Outcomes. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(05). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.317
Patel, Milan. "Dynamics of Sustainable Venture Scaling: Strategic Adaptation, Resource Constraints, and Long-Term Growth Outcomes." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 05, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.317.
Patel, Milan. "Dynamics of Sustainable Venture Scaling: Strategic Adaptation, Resource Constraints, and Long-Term Growth Outcomes." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 05 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.317.
References
- Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei‐Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22.
- Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
- Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440.
- Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441.
- Bloom, P., & Chatterji, A. (2009). Scaling social entrepreneurial impact. California Management Review, 51(3), 114–133.
- Bloom, P., & Smith, B. (2010). Identifying the drivers of social entrepreneurial impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(4), 24–32.
- Bocken, N. (2015). Sustainable venture capital. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 550–565.
- Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19.
- Cohen, B., & Winn, M. (2007). Market imperfections and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49.
- Dean, T., & McMullen, J. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 50–76.
- Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436.
- Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.
- Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy. Harvard Business Review.
Ethical Compliance & Review Process
- •All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
- •Review follows editorial policy.
- •Authors retain copyright.
- •Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
- •Published on: May 12 2026
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

