IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 05

Published on: May 2026

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SEISMIC DESIGN PROVISIONS: IMPACT OF IS 1893:2025 PART 1 AND PART 5 ON MULTI-STOREY RC BUILDINGS

Prajapati Keyur Jagdishbhai

Dr. Poonam I. Modi

Applied Mechanics Department L. D. College of Engineering Gujarat Technological University Ahmedabad

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

India is among the world's most seismically active nations, making robust earthquake-resistant design a critical imperative. The newly published IS 1893:2025 (Part 1 and Part 5) introduces sweeping revisions over IS 1893:2016, most notably a paradigm shift from Deterministic Earthquake Hazard Assessment (DEHA) to Probabilistic Earthquake Hazard Assessment (PEHA). Consequent changes include updated seismic zone maps with the introduction of Zone VI, revised peak ground acceleration values, refined design spectra extending to 10 seconds, probabilistic return-period-based structural importance classification, shear-wave-velocity-based soil site classification, and new provisions for Architectural Elements and Utilities (AEUs). This paper presents a systematic comparative study of IS 1893:2016 and IS 1893:2025 provisions applied to low-rise (G+6), mid-rise (G+14), and high-rise (G+19) reinforced concrete (RC) building models in Seismic Zone III/IV (Vadodara and Ahmedabad, India). All models are analyzed using ETABS v22.5.0 employing the Response Spectrum Method. Key seismic response parameters—base shear, story displacement, story drift ratio, and story shear—are extracted and compared. Results demonstrate that IS 1893:2025 yields base shear increases of 149–177%, maximum displacement increases of 123–184%, and maximum story drift increases of 126–192% relative to IS 1893:2016 for the same structural systems. The paper also presents torsion checks, mass irregularity checks, and soft story checks as mandated by IS 1893 (Part 5):2025. The findings underline that the 2025 provisions lead to significantly more conservative—and structurally safer—design outcomes, and have direct implications for design economy, reinforcement detailing, and the retrofitting of existing stock.

Keywords — IS 1893:2025; IS 1893:2016; Seismic Code Comparison; Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment; Base Shear; Story Drift; ETABS; RC Buildings; Response Spectrum Method; Zone Factor.

How to Cite this Paper

Jagdishbhai, P. K. (2026). Comparative Study of Seismic Design Provisions: Impact of Is 1893:2025 Part 1 And Part 5 on Multi-Storey RC Buildings. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(05). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.402

Jagdishbhai, Prajapati. "Comparative Study of Seismic Design Provisions: Impact of Is 1893:2025 Part 1 And Part 5 on Multi-Storey RC Buildings." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 05, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.402.

Jagdishbhai, Prajapati. "Comparative Study of Seismic Design Provisions: Impact of Is 1893:2025 Part 1 And Part 5 on Multi-Storey RC Buildings." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 05 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.402.

Search & Index

References

[1] BIS, IS 1893 (Part 1): Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures – General Provisions and Buildings. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 2016.

[2] BIS, IS 1893 (Part 1): Design Earthquake Hazard and Criteria for Earthquake-Resistant Design of Structures – General Provisions. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 2025.

[3] BIS, IS 1893 (Part 5): Design Earthquake Hazard and Criteria for Earthquake-Resistant Design of Structures – Buildings. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 2025.

[4] BIS, IS 456: Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice, 4th Revision. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 2000.

[5] BIS, IS 16700: Criteria for Structural Safety of Tall Concrete Buildings. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 2017.

[6] BIS, IS 13920: Ductile Design and Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Seismic Forces. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 2016.

[7] V. Kamalakar and C. Rajaram, "Historical Evolution of IS 1893 Base Shear Provisions: Towards a Novel Approach in the 2025 Code Revision," Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2026.2642758

[8] A.B. Dutta and D. Shukla, "Seismic Zone VI in IS 1893 (Part 1): 2025 — A Critical Review and Design Implications," International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1682–1706, 2026.

[9] D. Shah, "Comprehensive Analysis of Modifications in the Draft Code IS 1893 (WC) 2023 for RC Buildings," International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), vol. 11, no. 05, 2024.

[10] N. Subramanian and R. Leslie, "Impact of Draft IS 1893-2023 Code Provisions on Building Design," CE&CR Magazine, pp. 24–30, October 2023.

[11] A.K. Jain, "Critical Review of Selected Parts of Draft Code IS 1893-Parts 1 and 2, 2023," Technical Review, ver. 1.1, Centre for Structural and Earthquake Engineering, 2023.

[12] R. Debnath and L. Halder, "A Comparative Study of the Seismic Provisions of Indian Seismic Code IS 1893-2002 and Draft Indian Code IS 1893:2016," in Recent Advances in Structural Engineering (Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Vol. 12), Springer, 2019, pp. 151–160.

[13] H.J. Shah and S.K. Jain, Design Example of a Six Storey Building, IITK-GSDMA-EQ26-V3.0, IITK-GSDMA Project on Building Codes, IIT Kanpur, 2005.

[14] NDMA, Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Map of India – Final Report, National Disaster Management Authority, New Delhi, 2022.

[15] ASCE, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-22), Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2022.

[16] CSI, ETABS v22.5.0 – Extended Analysis of Buildings Systems, Computer and Structures Inc., Berkeley, CA, 2022.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: May 18 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top