IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 05

Published on: May 2026

QUEUEMATE: A BLOCKCHAIN-ENABLED REAL-WORLD PROCESS NAVIGATOR AND QUEUE INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM FOR PUBLIC SERVICE INSTITUTIONS

Anseema Sharma Govinda Lovanshi Kanak Pandey Shubhi Agrawal

Praveena Joshi

Department of Computer Science and Engineering (IoT)

Indore Institute of Science and Technology Indore Madhya Pradesh India

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Publicly accessible service institutions—among them Regional Transport Offices (RTOs), district hospitals, commercial banks, and municipal departments—continue to face serious operational shortcomings stemming from a lack of procedural transparency, uncontrolled crowd buildup at service windows, vulnerable manual document checking procedures, and the near-total absence of real-time guidance for visiting citizens. Empirical data gathered at Indian urban service centres show that citizens typically spend around 47 minutes standing in queues, while 32% of service visits fail outright because of missing or improperly verified documents.

Existing e-governance portals and basic token-issuing systems address only the surface layer of this problem and consistently fail to deliver secure, coordinated, institution-aware procedural guidance. This paper introduces QueueMate—a blockchain-powered, real-world process navigation and queue intelligence platform designed to reform the entire citizen-institution interaction from start to finish. The platform brings together an Android mobile application (built with Kotlin and Jetpack Compose), AI-driven queue demand prediction, smart-contract-governed document authentication, and an immutable audit layer anchored on Ethereum and Hyperledger networks.

How to Cite this Paper

Sharma, A., Lovanshi, G., Pandey, K. & Agrawal, S. (2026). QueueMate: A Blockchain-Enabled Real-World Process Navigator and Queue Intelligence System for Public Service Institutions. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(05). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.647

Sharma, Anseema, et al.. "QueueMate: A Blockchain-Enabled Real-World Process Navigator and Queue Intelligence System for Public Service Institutions." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 05, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.647.

Sharma, Anseema,Govinda Lovanshi,Kanak Pandey, and Shubhi Agrawal. "QueueMate: A Blockchain-Enabled Real-World Process Navigator and Queue Intelligence System for Public Service Institutions." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 05 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.647.

Search & Index

References


  1. Almeida, R., Ferreira, P., & Costa, L. (2018). Evaluating digital queue management systems in Brazilian government offices: A multi-site study. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(3), 412–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy001

  2. Androulaki, E., Barger, A., Bortnikov, V., Cachin, C., Christidis, K., De Caro, A., et al. (2018). Hyperledger Fabric: A distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains. Proceedings of the 13th EuroSys Conference, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3190508.3190538

  3. Android Developers. (2023). Jetpack Compose documentation. Google LLC. https://developer.android.com/jetpack/compose

  4. Azaria, A., Ekblaw, A., Vieira, T., & Lippman, A. (2016). MedRec: Using blockchain for medical data access and permission management. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data, 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/OBD.2016.11

  5. Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114–123.

  6. Centre for Good Governance. (2022). Citizen experience at Tier-2 city RTOs: A diagnostic survey. Government of Telangana.

  7. Dunphy, P., & Petitcolas, F. A. P. (2018). A first look at identity management schemes on the blockchain. IEEE Security & Privacy, 16(4), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2018.3111083

  8. Google Firebase. (2023). Firebase documentation. Google LLC. https://firebase.google.com/docs

  9. GSMA Intelligence. (2023). The mobile economy: India 2023. GSMA.


Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: May 20 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top