IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 6

Published on: June 2026

AI-DRIVEN GPS AND VISION-FREE NAVIGATION FOR MILITARY DRONES: A REVIEW OF THE CLAK FRAMEWORK AND EMERGING TRENDS IN GPS-DENIED UAV AUTONOMY

Major Ankur Singh Pathania

Faculty of Combat Engineering, Military College of Telecommunication Engineering, Mhow

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Reliable navigation in Global Navigation Satellite System denied environments has emerged as a critical requirement for modern unmanned aerial vehicle operations, particularly in military scenarios characterized by electronic warfare, signal spoofing, and contested electromagnetic environments. Conventional UAV navigation systems rely extensively on GPS and optical sensing, making them vulnerable to jamming, low-visibility conditions, and adversarial countermeasures. This paper examines the CLAK framework, an artificial intelligence-based navigation architecture that enables drones to perform autonomous positioning without dependence on GPS or camera-based systems. The study analyzes the framework’s sensor fusion approach, which integrates LiDAR, inertial measurement units, and barometric sensing with deep-learning architectures including convolutional neural networks, bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) networks, and attention mechanisms. The paper further situates CLAK within the broader evolution of GPS-denied navigation technologies, including inertial navigation systems, visual SLAM, visual-inertial odometry, and learning-based inertial navigation methods. Operational implications for military UAV applications such as autonomous swarming, urban reconnaissance, subterranean operations, and low-signature missions are evaluated. The study also discusses limitations related to domain adaptation, adversarial vulnerability, computational  integration,  and  verification challenges. The paper concludes that AI-enabled non-visual navigation frameworks represent a significant advancement in resilient autonomous systems and are likely to become central components of future multi-domain military operations

How to Cite this Paper

Pathania, M. A. S. (2026). AI-Driven GPS And Vision-Free Navigation for Military Drones: A Review of the CLAK Framework and Emerging Trends in GPS-Denied UAV Autonomy. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(6). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i6.107

Pathania, Major. "AI-Driven GPS And Vision-Free Navigation for Military Drones: A Review of the CLAK Framework and Emerging Trends in GPS-Denied UAV Autonomy." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 6, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i6.107.

Pathania, Major. "AI-Driven GPS And Vision-Free Navigation for Military Drones: A Review of the CLAK Framework and Emerging Trends in GPS-Denied UAV Autonomy." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 6 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i6.107.

Search & Index

References


  1. Cadena et al., "Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization andMapping: Toward the Robust-Perception Age," IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1309-1332, 2016.

  2. Scaramuzza and F. Fraundorfer, "Visual Odometry: Part I—The First 30 Years and Fundamentals," IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 80-92, 2011.

  3. Delmerico and D. Scaramuzza, "A Benchmark Comparison of Monocular Visual-Inertial Odometry Algorithms for Flying Robots," in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Brisbane, Australia, 2018, pp. 2502-2509.

  4. Sarquis Urzua, A. Munguía, and A. Grau, "Vision-based SLAM system for MAVs in GPS-denied environments," International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1-14, 2017.

  5. Song, S. Wang, Y. Han, and H. Li, "Exploring Deep Learning-Based Visual Localization Techniques for UAV Navigation in GPS-Denied Environments: AComprehensive Review," IEEE Access, vol. 12, 2024.

  6. Kim, J. Park, and D. Lee, "LiDAR-based localization techniques for autonomous aerial vehicles in complex environments," Sensors, vol. 23, no. 8, Art. no. 3921, 2023.

  7. A. Hsieh, V. Kumar, and S. Choudhury, "Multi-Robot Systems and Swarm Autonomy: A Survey of Challenges and Applications," Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, vol. 5, pp. 213-239,2022.

  8. Sharma and P. Rao, "Electronic Warfare Challenges in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Navigation Systems," Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 451-466, 2022.

  9. Chen, W. Liu, and H. Wang, "Multi-Sensor Fusion Architectures for GPS-Independent Drone Navigation," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 8221-8238, 2023.

  10. Zhang and S. Singh, "LOAM: Lidar Odometry and Mapping in Real-Time," Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2014.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: Jun 09 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top