IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 7

Published on: July 2026

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF INSTANT INVESTING IN THE FINTECH ERA: A BEHAVIORAL FINANCE PERSPECTIVE

Dr. Roshanpreet Kaur

Punjab College of Technical Education, Ludhiana

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

The rapid growth of financial technology (FinTech) has changed the way people invest, making financial markets more accessible, convenient, and driven by technology. Mobile trading apps, robo-advisory tools, algorithm-based recommendations, social trading platforms, and instant market alerts now allow investors to act on decisions almost as soon as they are made. This ease of access has widened participation in financial markets, but it has also created new psychological pressures that shape how investors think and behave. This paper looks at the psychological side of instant investing through a behavioral finance lens, drawing on existing academic work on investor conduct in digital settings. In particular, it considers how FinTech platforms interact with familiar behavioral biases, including overconfidence, herd behavior, loss aversion, confirmation bias, fear of missing out (FOMO), and present bias, and how this interaction can intensify irrational decisions.

Using a narrative review of peer-reviewed articles, books, and institutional reports, the paper traces how investor behavior has evolved during the FinTech era. The review shows that features such as one-click investing, gamified interfaces, personalized alerts, social media integration, and AI-generated recommendations speed up decision-making, leaving less room for careful analysis. As a result, many retail investors now lean more heavily on emotion, mental shortcuts, and peer influence than on objective financial assessment. Recent studies also suggest that while digital platforms have improved access and participation, they can just as easily encourage speculative trading and overtrading when financial literacy and platform design are not adequate to the task.

The paper concludes that digital investing needs to strike a balance between technological progress and behavioral awareness. Investor education, responsible platform design, regulatory attention, and behavioral interventions all have a role to play in encouraging informed, sustainable investment decisions. By pulling together these threads, the paper adds to the growing literature on the psychological consequences of instant investing within the evolving FinTech ecosystem.

Keywords: Behavioral Finance, FinTech, Instant Investing, Investor Psychology, Behavioral Biases, Retail Investors, Digital Investing, Financial Technology

How to Cite this Paper

Kaur, R. (2026). The Psychology of Instant Investing in the FinTech Era: A Behavioral Finance Perspective. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(7). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i7.051

Kaur, Roshanpreet. "The Psychology of Instant Investing in the FinTech Era: A Behavioral Finance Perspective." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 7, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i7.051.

Kaur, Roshanpreet. "The Psychology of Instant Investing in the FinTech Era: A Behavioral Finance Perspective." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 7 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i7.051.

Search & Index

References


  1. Amin, M. R., Nainggolan, Y. A., & Rahadi, R. A. (2025). The digital transformation of investment behavior: A systematic review of gambling tendencies in modern financial markets. Cogent Economics & Finance, 13(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2025.2568643

  2. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556400

  3. Bikhchandani, S., & Sharma, S. (2001). Herd behavior in financial markets. IMF Staff Papers, 47(3), 279–310. https://doi.org/10.2307/3867650

  4. Jung, D., Dorner, V., Weinhardt, C., & Pusmaz, H. (2018). Designing a robo-advisor for risk-averse, low-budget consumers. Electronic Markets, 28(3), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0279-9

  5. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

  6. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

  7. Kumar, S., & Goyal, N. (2015). Behavioural biases in investment decision making – A systematic literature review. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 7(1), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-07-2014-0022

  8. Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.1.5

  9. Nofsinger, J. R. (2018). The psychology of investing (6th ed.). Routledge.

  10. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). OECD/INFE international survey of adult financial literacy. OECD Publishing.

  11. Sahi, S. K. (2012). Neurofinance and investment behaviour. Studies in Economics and Finance, 29(4), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/10867371211266983

  12. Sahi, S. K., Arora, A. P., & Dhameja, N. (2013). An exploratory inquiry into the psychological biases in financial investment behavior. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 14(2), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2013.790387

  13. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

  14. Statman, M. (2019). Behavioral finance: The second generation. CFA Institute Research Foundation.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: Jul 07 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top