IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 7

Published on: July 2026

MATHEMATICAL MODELS FOR MEASURING AI-INDUCED SOCIAL EXCLUSION

Faseela V

Assistant Professor

Department of mathematics

SAFI INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED STUDY - VAZHAYUR

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become one of the most transformative technologies of the twenty-first century, significantly influencing governance, healthcare, education, finance, employment, transportation, and public service delivery. As AI-driven systems become increasingly integrated into decision-making processes, concerns have emerged regarding their potential to reinforce existing socio-economic inequalities through algorithmic bias, unequal digital access, and technological exclusion. These challenges are particularly significant for marginalized communities in developing countries such as India, where disparities in digital infrastructure, education, income, and technological literacy continue to limit equitable participation in the AI-driven economy.

While numerous studies have examined Artificial Intelligence from technological, economic, and ethical perspectives, relatively few have developed rigorous mathematical frameworks for measuring AI-induced social exclusion. Existing assessments largely rely on qualitative indicators or descriptive statistical methods, which often fail to capture the complex interactions among socio-economic, technological, institutional, and behavioural variables. Consequently, there is a growing need for robust mathematical models capable of quantifying social exclusion, predicting vulnerable populations, optimizing policy interventions, and evaluating the effectiveness of inclusive AI strategies.

The present study develops mathematical models for measuring AI-induced social exclusion by integrating statistical modelling, fuzzy set theory, graph theory, optimization techniques, probability theory, and machine learning algorithms. A comprehensive Artificial Intelligence Social Exclusion Index (AISEI) is proposed to quantify the degree of exclusion experienced by individuals and communities based on multidimensional indicators including digital accessibility, AI literacy, internet connectivity, educational attainment, economic status, algorithmic fairness, and access to AI-enabled public services.

The research further develops predictive models using regression analysis, decision trees, random forests, support vector machines, gradient boosting algorithms, and artificial neural networks to estimate the probability of AI exclusion among different socio-economic groups. Optimization models are employed to determine equitable allocation of digital infrastructure and AI resources under budgetary constraints, while graph-theoretic models are utilized to analyse patterns of digital connectivity and identify structurally isolated communities. Fuzzy mathematical models are incorporated to address uncertainty and imprecision associated with socio-economic indicators, enabling more realistic assessment of AI accessibility.

The proposed mathematical framework is validated using empirical data collected from marginalized communities across India. Model performance is evaluated using standard statistical and machine learning validation measures including Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, Area Under the Curve (AUC), precision, recall, F1-score, and cross-validation techniques. Sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo simulations are further conducted to examine the robustness of the proposed models under varying socio-economic conditions.

The findings are expected to contribute significantly to the fields of applied mathematics, mathematical modelling, artificial intelligence, and public policy by providing a scientifically rigorous framework for measuring digital inequality and AI-induced social exclusion. The proposed models will assist policymakers in identifying vulnerable populations, optimizing resource allocation, designing equitable AI policies, and promoting inclusive digital development. Ultimately, the study demonstrates how mathematical modelling can serve as an effective tool for ensuring that technological advancement contributes to social justice, sustainable development, and equitable participation in the emerging AI-driven society.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Mathematical Modelling, Social Exclusion, Fuzzy Mathematics, Optimization, Machine Learning, Graph Theory, Digital Inclusion, AI Fairness, Social Exclusion Index.

How to Cite this Paper

V, F. (2026). Mathematical Models for Measuring AI-Induced Social Exclusion. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(7), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i7.251

V, Faseela. "Mathematical Models for Measuring AI-Induced Social Exclusion." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 7, 2026, pp. 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i7.251.

V, Faseela. "Mathematical Models for Measuring AI-Induced Social Exclusion." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 7 (2026): 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i7.251.

Search & Index

References


  • Bellman, R. E., & Zadeh, L. A. (1970). Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17(4), B141–B164.

  • Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer.

  • Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.

  • Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280.

  • Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.

  • NITI Aayog. (2018). National strategy for artificial intelligence: AI for all. Government of India.

  • O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Publishing Group.

  • (2019). OECD principles on artificial intelligence. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

  • Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.

  • (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. UNESCO.

  • World Bank. (2021). World development report 2021: Data for better lives. World Bank.

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: Jul 28 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top