IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 7

Published on: July 2026

INTENT-AWARE ADAPTIVE TRUST RETRIEVAL-AUGMENTED GENERATION (IAT-RAG): A FRAMEWORK FOR TRUSTWORTHY DOCUMENT QUESTION ANSWERING USING OPEN-SOURCE LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS

Rahisa Bano

Amandeep

Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, GJUS&T, Hisar, India.

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) show impressive natural-language understanding and generation skills but are limited to knowledge that is pre-stored and trained, and can hallucinate when asked about private, domain-specific or newly generated documents. While conventional RAG and its recent variants (Hybrid RAG, Corrective RAG (CRAG), Adaptive-RAG, FLARE, RAPTOR) each make improvements to only a single stage of the retrieval pipeline, they do not effectively condition retrieval on the intent of the query and quantify the trustworthiness of evidence before generation. We introduce the Intent-Aware Adaptive Trust Retrieval-Augmented Generation (IAT-RAG) framework that integrates (i) query-intent classification to guide each query to a suitable retrieval strategy, (ii) an Adaptive Trust Score (ATS) to adjust the retrieval confidence based on the model's intent classification and (iii) an Evidence Quality Score (EQS) to filter the credibility and internal consistency of each retrieved passage before it is used for generation. Conventional RAG passes all top-k retrieved passages to the generator, whereas the passages supplied to the generator are only those that meet Combined Trust threshold from an intent perspective. The paper summarizes the evolution of the conversational AI, Transformer-based LLMs, and RAG architectures, provides an illustrative evaluation protocol and literature-based comparison, and summarizes comparative results which suggest that the IAT-RAG system should outperform all seven baselines on the tasks of citation accuracy and retrieval F1-score, particularly on multi-hop and comparative queries. The current work is a design and protocol stage contribution, whereas the actual implementation is fully open-source (Sentence-Transformer embeddings, a FAISS vector index, and an open-source instruction-tuned LLM), while complete empirical validation on real data, including statistical-significance testing, is identified as the next immediate step.

Keywords: Retrieval-Augmented Generation, Large Language Models, Intent Classification, Adaptive Trust Score, Evidence Quality Score, Hallucination Mitigation, Open-Source LLMs.

How to Cite this Paper

Bano, R. (2026). Intent-Aware Adaptive Trust Retrieval-Augmented Generation (IAT-RAG): A Framework for Trustworthy Document Question Answering Using Open-Source Large Language Models. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(7), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i7.255

Bano, Rahisa. "Intent-Aware Adaptive Trust Retrieval-Augmented Generation (IAT-RAG): A Framework for Trustworthy Document Question Answering Using Open-Source Large Language Models." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 7, 2026, pp. 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i7.255.

Bano, Rahisa. "Intent-Aware Adaptive Trust Retrieval-Augmented Generation (IAT-RAG): A Framework for Trustworthy Document Question Answering Using Open-Source Large Language Models." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 7 (2026): 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i7.255.

Search & Index

References

[1] J. Weizenbaum, “ELIZA—A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine,” Commun. ACM, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 36–45, 1966.

[2] R. S. Wallace, “The anatomy of A.L.I.C.E.,” in Parsing the Turing Test, Springer, 2009, pp. 181–210.

[3] I. Sutskever, O. Vinyals, and Q. V. Le, “Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks,” Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 27, 2014.

[4] A. Vaswani et al., “Attention is all you need,” Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 30, 2017.

[5] J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” in Proc. NAACL-HLT, 2019, pp. 4171–4186.

[6] T. B. Brown et al., “Language models are few-shot learners,” Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020.

[7] H. Touvron et al., “LLaMA: Open and efficient foundation language models,” Meta AI, 2023.

[8] A. Q. Jiang et al., “Mistral 7B,” arXiv:2310.06825, 2023.

[9] N. Reimers and I. Gurevych, “Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using Siamese BERT-networks,” in Proc. EMNLP-IJCNLP, 2019, pp. 3982–3992.

[10] J. Johnson, M. Douze, and H. Jégou, “Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs,” IEEE Trans. Big Data, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 535–547, 2019.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: Jul 29 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top