IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 8

Published on: August 2026

PERCEPTION AND SOCIAL STIGMA OF PCOD: A STUDY AMONG FEMALE PHARMACY STUDENTS

Saleha Aziz Fatima Erum Rufaida Dr.Rahila Tarannum

INDEPENDENT RESEARCHER

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS), also known as Polycystic Ovarian Disease (PCOD) is one of the most common endocrine diseases faced by women in the reproductive age group worldwide, with an expected prevalence rate between 5–15%. PCOS is the most common endocrine disorder consulted by health providers, yet it is a long-stigmatized condition which stigma is increased because of stereotypes related to cultural and community beliefs associated with traditional feminine body ideals, beauty/fertility.

Common female body image concerns diagnosed with PCOS (irregular periods, infertility, weight gain, acne) and/or hirsutism are often at odds with socially defined femininity. As a result,

Those affected women with PCOS frequently adopt these societal expectations, perceiving themselves as “less feminine” or inadequate due to their helplessness to meet cultural norms related to appearance and reproductive roles.

Also, the social stigma with PCOS further perpetuates misconceptions around the disorder like that it only results from poor lifestyle choices, or it only affects those of reproductive ages. This misunderstanding can trigger blame, lack of empathy and no social support. Also, stigma is not only associated with society but within healthcare environments as well, where patients may suffer emotional distress due to being undiagnosed for a long time and low levels of awareness.

Theoretical perspectives, including Erving Goffman’s stigma theory, explain how individuals can be classified and sidelined when they are deviating from social norms. For PCOS, physically obvious signs of conveniently available weight problems.

How to Cite this Paper

Fatima, S. A., Rufaida, E. & Tarannum, R. (2026). Perception and Social Stigma of PCOD: A Study Among Female Pharmacy Students. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(8), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i8.263

Fatima, Saleha, et al.. "Perception and Social Stigma of PCOD: A Study Among Female Pharmacy Students." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 8, 2026, pp. 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i8.263.

Fatima, Saleha,Erum Rufaida, and Rahila Tarannum. "Perception and Social Stigma of PCOD: A Study Among Female Pharmacy Students." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 8 (2026): 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i8.263.

Search & Index

References


  • The sample size of 48 respondents is relatively small, limiting the generalisability of findings to broader populations.

  • Convenience sampling introduces selection bias; respondents who self-select into a survey about PCOD may already have higher awareness or personal investment in the topic.

  • The study was conducted at a single institution, restricting cross-institutional comparison.

  • All data are self-reported, which introduces the possibility of social desirability bias — particularly in responses relating to stigma and disclosure.

  • As a cross-sectional study, no causal relationships can be established between variables.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: Sep 01 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top