Published on: August 2026
FROM DRIFT DETECTION TO DIAGNOSIS: AN EXPLAINABLE FRAMEWORK FOR DEPLOYED MACHINE LEARNING
Tambe Ankit Sampat
Modern Education Society’s Wadia College of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Article Status
Available Documents
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) models are increasingly deployed in real-world environments where data characteristics, user behaviour, and operating conditions may change over time. Such changes can lead to data or concept drift and may gradually reduce model reliability. Existing monitoring approaches can identify distributional changes or performance degradation, but they often provide limited information about why the changes occur. Similarly, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods can explain model predictions but are frequently treated separately from continuous drift monitoring. This paper proposes a unified drift-aware framework for explainable diagnostics in deployed machine learning systems. The framework integrates data-drift detection, model-performance monitoring, explainability, and diagnostic decision-making into a continuous monitoring pipeline. Statistical drift detection methods are used to identify changes between reference and production data, while XAI techniques such as SHAP and LIME are used to identify important features associated with changes in model behaviour. The framework combines drift indicators and performance information to generate interpretable diagnostic reports and recommend suitable maintenance actions. The proposed approach aims to improve the transparency, reliability, and maintainability of deployed ML systems by connecting drift detection with actionable explanations. The framework can support proactive model monitoring and assist practitioners in deciding whether continued monitoring, investigation, recalibration, or model retraining is required.
Keywords: Explainable AI,Machine Learning Deployment, Model Monitoring,Drift Detection
How to Cite this Paper
Sampat, T. A. (2026). From Drift Detection to Diagnosis: An Explainable Framework for Deployed Machine Learning. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(8), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i8.295
Sampat, Tambe. "From Drift Detection to Diagnosis: An Explainable Framework for Deployed Machine Learning." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 8, 2026, pp. 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i8.295.
Sampat, Tambe. "From Drift Detection to Diagnosis: An Explainable Framework for Deployed Machine Learning." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 8 (2026): 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i8.295.
References
1.Amershi, S., Begel, A., Bird, C., DeLine, R., Gall, H., Kamar, E., Nagappan, N., Nushi, B., & Zimmermann, T. (2019). Software engineering for machine learning: A case study. Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice, 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIP.2019.00042
2.Bifet, A., & Gavalda, R. (2007). Learning from time-changing data with adaptive windowing. Proceedings of the 2007 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, 443–448.
3.Breck, E., Cai, S., Nielsen, E., Salib, M., & Sculley, D. (2017). The ML test score: A rubric for ML production readiness and technical debt reduction. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, 1123–1131. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2017.8258038
4.Demšar, J., & Bosnić, Z. (2018). Detecting concept drift in data streams using model explanation. Expert Systems with Applications, 92, 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.10.003
5.Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608.
6.Gama, J., Žliobaitė, I., Bifet, A., Pechenizkiy, M., & Bouchachia, A. (2014). A survey on concept drift adaptation. ACM Computing Surveys, 46(4), Article 44, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/2523813
7.Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4765–4774.
8.Lu, J., Liu, A., Dong, F., Gu, F., Gama, J., & Zhang, G. (2018). Learning under concept drift: A review. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 31(12), 2346–2363.
9.Molnar, C. (2022). Interpretable machine learning. https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/
10.Page, E. S. (1954). Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika, 41(1/2), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/41.1-2.100
Ethical Compliance & Review Process
- •All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
- •Review follows editorial policy.
- •Authors retain copyright.
- •Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
- •Published on: Sep 01 2026
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

