IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 9

Published on: September 2026

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF LOW-CALCIUM FLY ASH AND SLAG-BASED GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE

Manish Meshram

Prof. Ashish shrivas

Civil Engineering Department,

Vikrant University, Gwalior, (M.P.) India

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Geopolymer concretes produced using fly ash and slag (FAGPC and SGPC) were investigated in terms of their mechanical properties and short-term durability performance. An alkaline activating solution was prepared by combining sodium silicate (Na₂SiO₃) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solutions. Conventional ordinary Portland cement (OPC) concrete was also prepared for comparison. The primary objective of the study was to assess the potential of geopolymer concrete as an alternative to conventional Portland cement concrete (PCC) for structural applications. The research also aimed to support the development and standardisation of geopolymer concrete for use in the construction industry.

Concrete specimens incorporating slag-based geopolymer concrete (SGPC), fly ash-based geopolymer concrete (FAGPC), and OPC concrete were prepared and exposed to different aggressive environments, including 5% sulfuric acid, 5% magnesium sulfate (MgSO₄), and 3.5% sodium chloride (NaCl) solution representing seawater conditions. The durability performance was evaluated through acid-resistance testing, visual examination, and measurements of changes in specimen weight. Compressive strength tests were conducted before and after chemical exposure to determine the effect of these aggressive environments on the mechanical performance of the geopolymer concretes.

The results indicated that SGPC containing 100% slag exhibited higher strength and durability than FAGPC containing 100% fly ash. This superior performance was attributed to the formation of a denser and stronger cross-linked aluminosilicate polymer network in the slag-based geopolymer concrete. Furthermore, the 100% fly ash-based geopolymer concrete demonstrated better durability than conventional OPC concrete under the investigated chemical environments. However, its mechanical performance was lower than that of OPC concrete, mainly due to the relatively low reactivity of fly ash, its lower calcium content, and the more porous internal structure of the geopolymer matrix. Among all the chemical exposure conditions, sulfuric acid produced the most severe deterioration in all types of concrete.

 

Keywords: Fly ash–slag-based geopolymer concrete (FAGPC/SGPC); mechanical properties; durability; sulfuric acid; magnesium sulfate; seawater; chemical attack.

How to Cite this Paper

Meshram, M. (2026). Experimental Investigation of the Mechanical Performance of Low-Calcium Fly Ash and Slag-Based Geopolymer Concrete. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(9), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i9.078

Meshram, Manish. "Experimental Investigation of the Mechanical Performance of Low-Calcium Fly Ash and Slag-Based Geopolymer Concrete." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 9, 2026, pp. 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i9.078.

Meshram, Manish. "Experimental Investigation of the Mechanical Performance of Low-Calcium Fly Ash and Slag-Based Geopolymer Concrete." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 9 (2026): 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i9.078.

Search & Index

References


  1. ACI 363R-92 (1992),State of the Art Report on High Strength Concrete,ACI Committee Report 363, American Concrete Institute, Dteroit, 363R1-363R55.

  2. Akcay, B.andTasdemir, M.A. (2009),“Optimisation of using lightweight aggregates in mitigating autogenous deformation of concrete”,Build.Mater.,23(1),353-363.

  3. Alii, M.R. (2007),“Performance of plain and blended cements exposed to high sulphate concentrations”,Cement Res.,19(4),167-175.

  4. Ariffin, M.A.M., Bhutta, M.A.R., Hussin, M.W., Mohd Tahir, M.andAziah, N. (2013),“Sulfuric acid resistance of blended ash geopolymer concrete”,Build.Mater.,43, 80-86.

  5. 5ASTM C267-01 (2012),Standard Test Methods for Chemical Resistance of Mortars, Grouts, and Monolithic Surfacings and Polymer Concretes.

  6. ASTM C39/C39M-12 (2012),Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, 4-2 Annual Book of ASTM Standard, Philadelphia.

  7. Bakharev, T. (2005),“Durability of geopolymer materials in sodium and magnesium sulfate solutions”,Cement Concrete Res.,35(6),1233-1246.

  8. Bassuoni, M.T.and Nehdi,M.L.(2007),“Resistance of self-consolidating concrete to sulfuric acid attack with consecutive pH reduction”,37,1070-1084.

  9. Bondar, D., Lynsdale, C.J., Milestone, N.B. andHassani, N. (2015),“Sulfate resistance of alkali activated pozzolans”,J.Concrete Struct.Mater.,9(2),145-158.

  10. Visitanupong, C. (2009),“Durability of fly ash based geopolymer mortar”,Thesis Approval, Graduate School, Kasetsart University, Thailand.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: Sep 17 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top