IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 9

Published on: September 2026

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE COST EFFECTIVENESS OF AAC BLOCKS AND CONVENTIONAL BRICKS IN RESIDENTIAL AND PUBLIC BUILDING CONSTRUCTION

Mohit Verma

Prof. Ashish Shrivas

Civil Engineering Department,

Vikrant University, Gwalior, (M.P.) India

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

The selection of suitable building materials is an important factor in achieving economical, energy-efficient, and sustainable construction. Conventional materials such as red bricks are widely used in residential and public buildings because of their availability and established construction practices. However, their use can contribute to environmental impacts and may provide limited thermal insulation compared with modern walling materials. The increasing demand for energy-efficient buildings has therefore encouraged the use of alternative materials such as Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) blocks.

This study evaluates the cost effectiveness and environmental performance of AAC blocks in comparison with conventional red brick masonry. The research considers important parameters such as material cost, labour requirements, construction time, energy consumption, thermal performance, and environmental impact. The performance of the two wall systems is assessed for residential and public/commercial buildings to determine their suitability as sustainable construction alternatives.

AAC blocks are lightweight and possess better thermal insulation properties, which can reduce heat transfer through the building envelope. Improved thermal performance can consequently decrease the energy required for heating and cooling, resulting in lower operational costs over the service life of a building. In addition, the reduced weight of AAC masonry may contribute to savings in structural components, transportation, and handling.

The study indicates that the adoption of AAC block wall systems can provide significant economic and energy-related benefits. The analysis suggests that initial construction costs can potentially be reduced by approximately 14.3% for residential buildings and 9.4% for commercial/public buildings. Similarly, energy consumption and associated operational costs may be reduced by approximately 23.6% and 24.6%, respectively. These findings demonstrate that AAC blocks can be a viable alternative to conventional red bricks for modern building construction.

Therefore, the use of AAC blocks can contribute to the development of more economical, energy-efficient, and environmentally responsible buildings. The study highlights the importance of selecting construction materials based not only on their initial cost and availability but also on their long-term energy performance, environmental impact, and overall life-cycle benefits.

 

 

Keywords: AAC Blocks, Red Bricks, Cost Effectiveness, Energy Efficiency, Thermal Performance, Sustainable Construction, Building Materials, Building Envelope.

How to Cite this Paper

Verma, M. (2026). A Comparative Study on the Cost Effectiveness of AAC Blocks and Conventional Bricks in Residential and Public Building Construction. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(9), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i9.064

Verma, Mohit. "A Comparative Study on the Cost Effectiveness of AAC Blocks and Conventional Bricks in Residential and Public Building Construction." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 9, 2026, pp. 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i9.064.

Verma, Mohit. "A Comparative Study on the Cost Effectiveness of AAC Blocks and Conventional Bricks in Residential and Public Building Construction." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 9 (2026): 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i9.064.

Search & Index

References


  • Abdel-Hadi, A. (2012). Assessing Housing Interior Sustainability in a New Egyptian City. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.249

  • Adekunle, A. (2018). Types Of Interior Wall Finishes Materials. Retrieved from https://www.propertypro.ng/blog/types-of-interior-wall-finishes-materials/

  • Adewale, B. A., Babalola, O. D., Jegede, F. O., Afolabi, A., Oyenuga, T., & Obi, C. (2018). Dataset on cost comparative analysis of different walling materials in residential buildings in a developing economy. Data in Brief, 19, 1918–1924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.06.102

  • Alatawneh, B. (2017). Perforated Building’ S Envelope : Guiding The Early Design Phases. Universita Degli Studi Di Palermo.

  • Ali, O. (2008). Production of Fired Clay Bricks and Pozzolana from Expansive Soil. University of Khartoum.

  • Andrew, R. M. (2017). Global CO 2 emissions from cement production. Earth System Science Data, 1–52. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org.kuleuven.ezproxy.kuleuven.be/10.5194/essd-10-195-2018

  • (2009). Acoustic and thermal guide A guide for energy saving and noise comfort in buildings.

  • (2017a). Standard 90.1-Performance Rating Method Reference Manual, (September). https://doi.org/10.2172/1398228
    ASHRAE. (2017b). Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality in Residential Buildings, 8400. Retrieved from www.ashrae.org

  • (2014). ASTM C1363 − 11 Standard Test Method for Thermal Performance of Building Materials and Envelope Assemblies by Means of a Hot Box Apparatus 1. American Society for Testing Materials, 90(Reapproved), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1520/C1363-11.2

  • Attia, S. (2012). Development of benchmark models for the Egyptian residential buildings sector. Applied Energy, 94(April 2019), 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.01.065

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: Sep 22 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top