IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 04

Published on: April 2026

A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF SEISMIC EVALUATION OF BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACES IN REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS

Enjamuri Akash M

A.G. Hansora

L. D. College of Engineering Ahmedabad India

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Buckling-Restrained Braces (BRBs) have emerged as one of the most effective seismic energy dissipation systems for reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures. Unlike conventional steel braces that buckle under compressive loading, BRBs exhibit symmetric yielding in both tension and compression, providing stable hysteresis and superior energy dissipation. This review paper critically synthesizes five peer-reviewed studies covering key aspects of BRB application in RC frames: composite behaviour between RC frames and elastic steel frames, BRB deformation capacity and its influence on collapse performance, performance-based plastic design of dual RC-BRB frame systems, comparative evaluation of BRBs against fluid viscous dampers, and probabilistic seismic performance assessment using incremental dynamic analysis. The review identifies consistent benefits of BRB retrofitting in terms of drift reduction, energy dissipation, and structural safety. Key findings include: accounting for composite stiffness between RC and steel frames can reduce required BRB steel tonnage by up to 20%; a BRB ultimate deformation safety coefficient (α) of 1.2 provides adequate structural redundancy; an optimal story shear ratio of 0.3–0.5 is recommended for dual RC-BRBF systems; and BRBs outperform fluid viscous dampers in stiffness and yield capacity under Indian seismic conditions. The paper concludes with research gaps and future directions for BRB applications in RC structures.

Keywords— Buckling-restrained braces, incremental dynamic analysis, performance-based design, pushover analysis, non-linear time history analysis

How to Cite this Paper

M, E. A. (2026). A Comprehensive Review of Seismic Evaluation of Buckling Restrained Braces in Reinforced Concrete Buildings. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(04). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.920

M, Enjamuri. "A Comprehensive Review of Seismic Evaluation of Buckling Restrained Braces in Reinforced Concrete Buildings." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 04, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.920.

M, Enjamuri. "A Comprehensive Review of Seismic Evaluation of Buckling Restrained Braces in Reinforced Concrete Buildings." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 04 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.920.

Search & Index

References

[1] Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), “Quantification of building seismic performance factors (FEMA P695),” Washington, DC, USA, 2009.

[2] S. C. Goel and S. H. Chao, “Performance-based plastic design: Earthquake-resistant steel structures,” International Code Council, 2008.

[3] M. Fujimoto, A. Wada, E. Saeki, A. Watanabe, and Y. Hitomi, “A study on the unbonded brace encased in buckling-restraining concrete and steel tubes,” Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Trans. AIJ), vol. 34B, 1988, pp. 249–258.

[4] T. Takeuchi, “Buckling-restrained brace: History, design and applications,” in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas, 2018.

[5] P. Castaldo, E. Tubaldi, F. Selvi, and L. Gioiella, “Seismic performance of an existing RC structure retrofitted with buckling restrained braces,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 33, 2021, pp. 101688.

[6] P. Saingam et al., “Composite behaviour in RC buildings retrofitted using buckling-restrained braces with elastic steel frames,” Engineering Structures, vol. 219, 2020, pp. 110896.

[7] J. Bai, F. Cheng, S. Jin, and J. Ou, “Assessing and quantifying the earthquake response of reinforced concrete buckling-restrained brace frame structures,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 17, no. 7, 2019, pp. 3847–3871.

[8] S. Kong, F. Shi, Y. Zhou, Y. Ma, and L. Xie, “Influence of BRBs deformation capacity on the seismic performance of RC building frames,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 161, 2022, pp. 107442.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: Apr 29 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top