IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 7

Published on: July 2026

A PORTABLE REAL-TIME ELECTRONIC NOSE FOR EVALUATING SEA FOOD FRESHNESS USING MACHINE LEARNING

ARJUN GS ARUL G BALAMURAGAN S DEEPAK M

COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING

DHANALAKSHMI SRINIVASAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE (AUTONOMOUS)

PERAMBALUR-621 212

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Real-time evaluation of seafood freshness is essential for ensuring food quality and safety, as approximately 35% of seafood is lost or wasted due to quality deterioration. This study introduces a portable, real-time electronic nose (e-nose) system designed to assess freshness and predict remaining shelf life using machine learning (ML) algorithms. The hardware utilizes a gas sensor array connected to an ESP Devkit-C S3 microcontroller to detect volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted during spoilage. From an initial pool of eight sensors, four were selected based on Predictive Power Score (PPS) analysis for their high sensitivity to spoilage indicators: MQ137 (ammonia), MQ2 (alcohol), MQ136 (hydrogen sulphide), and MQ9 (methane). The core of the system is the E-Nose-Based Seafood Freshness (ESF) dataset, which contains 336,997 data points from tuna, salmon, cod, shrimp, and crab.

To address class imbalance, the dataset was processed using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE), resulting in 457,954 samples for robust training. Various ML models, including Random Forest, KNN, Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, AdaBoost, Gradient Boosting, and XGBoost, were evaluated for classification and regression tasks. XGBoost emerged as the superior algorithm, achieving 100% precision, recall, and accuracy in classification, with a detection time of under 1 millisecond and a memory footprint of approximately 4 kB. For regression tasks, an RMSE of 0.08. These results confirm the proposed system as a lightweight, scalable, and highly accurate solution for the seafood supply chain, providing a non-invasive and cost-effective alternative to traditional chemical or microbiological methods.

 

How to Cite this Paper

GS, A., G, A., S, B. & M, D. (2026). A Portable Real-Time Electronic Nose for Evaluating Sea Food Freshness Using Machine Learning. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(7), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i7.225

GS, ARJUN, et al.. "A Portable Real-Time Electronic Nose for Evaluating Sea Food Freshness Using Machine Learning." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 7, 2026, pp. 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i7.225.

GS, ARJUN,ARUL G,BALAMURAGAN S, and DEEPAK M. "A Portable Real-Time Electronic Nose for Evaluating Sea Food Freshness Using Machine Learning." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 7 (2026): 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i7.225.

Search & Index

References


  1. F. Wilkens and A. D. Hatman, ‘‘An electronic analog for the olfactory processes,’’ J. Food Sci., vol. 116, pp. 372–378, May 1964.

  2. M. Buck, F. G. Allen, and M. Dalton, ‘‘Detection of chemical species by surface effects on metals and semiconductors,’’ in Bell Telephone Laboratories. Boston, MA, USA: Spartan Books Inc., 1965.

  3. Dravnieks and P. J. Trotter, ‘‘Polar vapour detector based on thermal modulation of contact potential,’’ J. Set Instrum., vol. 42, no. 8, p. 624, Aug. 1965.

  4. Persaud and G. H. Dodd, ‘‘Analysis of discrimination mechanisms of the mammalian olfactory system using a model nose,’’ Nature, vol. 299, pp. 352–355, Sep. 1982.

  5. Ikegami and M. Kaneyasu, ‘‘Olfactory detection using integrated sen sors,’’ Proc. 3rd Int. Conf Solid-State Sens. Actuators, Philadelphia, PA USA, Jun. 1985, pp. 136–139.

  6. Kaneyasu, A. Ikegami, H. Arima, and S. Iwanga, ‘‘Smell Identification Using a Thick-Film Hybrid Gas Sensor,’’ IEEE Trans. Compon., Hybrids, Manuf. Technol., vol. CHMT-10, no. 2, pp. 267–273, Jun. 1987.

  7. Schild, Chemosensory Information Processing. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 1990.

  8. W. Gardner and P. N. Bartlett, Sensors and Sensory Systems for an Electronic Nose, vol.

  9. Washington, DC, USA: NATO, 1992.

  10. C. Romain, D. Godefroid, M. Kuske, and J. Nicolas, ‘‘Monitoring the exhaust air of a compost pile as a process variable with an e-nose,’’ Sens. Actuators B, Chem., vol. 106, pp. 29–35, Apr. 2005.

  11. Zampolli, I. Elmi, F. Ahmed, M. Passini, G. C. Cardinali, S. Nicoletti, and L.Dori, ‘‘An electronic nose based on solid state sensor arrays for low cost indoor air quality monitoring applications,’’ Sens. Actuators B, Chem., vol. 101, pp. 39–46, Jun. 2004.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: Jul 28 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top