IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 04

Published on: April 2026

AI-POWERED PHISHING WEBSITE DETECTION USING MACHINE LEARNING AND BROWSER EXTENSION INTEGRATION

T. Ashreshta Gnan Sajid Baig S. Chakravarthy T. Sai Kumar

RAVULA KARTHEEK

Department of CSE (DATA SCIENCE), Bapatla Engineering College: Bapatla, India

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Cybercrime has many forms, and phishing is one of the most common types. There were almost 989,000 phishing incidents in the first quarter of 2024 alone! Because conventional defenses rely on blacklists to catch phishing URLs, they cannot detect phishing attacks that use new or different types of phishing URLs. This leaves millions of users at risk of having their data stolen, their identities compromised, or their money stolen as a result of phishing. This study presents a new phishing detection system called PhishGuard. PhishGuard is a browser extension that runs on Google Chrome and uses machine learning to classify each website as either a phishing website or a legitimate website in real-time. PhishGuard collects various URL-based and domain-based features of websites (e.g., URL length, special character count, HTTPS status, redirection type, etc.) and input these features into an optimized ensemble protocol that is based upon a combination of multiple classification algorithms. PhishGuard was tested against a number of established methods of phishing detection, including Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, and Support Vector Machines. The results demonstrate that PhishGuard outperformed these approaches in terms of detection accuracy. PhishGuard achieved an accuracy rating of 96.75% compared to Logistic Regression at 88.45%, Decision Tree at 91.20%, and Support Vector Machines at 90.35%. PhishGuard provides users with instant alerts after visiting a phishing website, maintains a browsing history log, and works automatically without requiring any manual user involvement. PhishGuard is an innovative, lightweight, scalable, and practical anti-phishing tool that can be deployed in any browser environment, with clear capabilities for future integration of enhanced deep learning processes and real-time threat intelligence.

How to Cite this Paper

Gnan, T. A., Baig, S., Chakravarthy, S. & Kumar, T. S. (2026). AI-Powered Phishing Website Detection using Machine Learning and Browser Extension Integration. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(04). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.381

Gnan, T., et al.. "AI-Powered Phishing Website Detection using Machine Learning and Browser Extension Integration." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 04, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.381.

Gnan, T.,Sajid Baig,S. Chakravarthy, and T. Kumar. "AI-Powered Phishing Website Detection using Machine Learning and Browser Extension Integration." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 04 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.381.

Search & Index

References

[1] Anti-Phishing Working Group (APWG), "Phishing Activity Trends Report, Q1 2024," APWG, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://apwg.org/trendsreports/

[2] Federal Bureau of Investigation, "Internet Crime Report 2023," FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), Washington, D.C., 2024.

[3] Google, "Google Safe Browsing API Documentation," Google LLC, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://developers.google.com/safe-browsing

[4] S. Garera, N. Provos, M. Chew, and A. D. Rubin, "A Framework for Detection and Measurement of Phishing Attacks," in Proc. ACM Workshop on Recurring Malcode (WORM), Alexandria, VA, USA, 2007, pp. 1–8.

[5] B. Zhu, B. Kang, J. Li, and J. Ma, "Phishing Detection Using URL-Based Heuristics with Cross-Site Validation," IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 28574–28587, 2021.

[6] R. M. Mohammad, F. Thabtah, and L. McCluskey, "Predicting Phishing Websites Based on Self-Structuring Neural Network," Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 443–458, 2014.

[7] S. Garera, N. Provos, M. Chew, and A. Rubin, "A Framework for Detection and Measurement of Phishing Attacks," ACM Workshop on Recurring Malcode, 2007.

[8] A. Y. Fu, W. Liu, and X. Deng, "Detecting Phishing Web Pages with Visual Similarity Assessment Based on Earth Mover's Distance," IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 301–311, 2006.

[9] J. Ma, L. K. Saul, S. Savage, and G. M. Voelker, "Learning to Detect Malicious URLs," ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–24, 2011.

[10] I. Fette, N. Sadeh, and A. Tomasic, "Learning to Detect Phishing Emails," in Proc. 16th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), Banff, AB, Canada, 2007, pp. 649–656.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: Apr 15 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top