The transformation of workplace structures after the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of Work-from-Home (WFH), Work-from-Office (WFO), and Hybrid work models across industries. Organizations continue to face challenges in identifying the most effective work arrangement capable of balancing productivity, employee engagement, well-being, and operational efficiency. The present study comparatively examines employee perceptions regarding cost implications, productivity, engagement, work-life balance, and future workplace preferences across different work models.

The study adopts a descriptive research design based on primary data collected from 300 respondents through a structured questionnaire using purposive sampling. Statistical tools such as percentage analysis, ranking analysis, ANOVA, Independent Sample t-test, and Chi-square test were applied using SPSS and Microsoft Excel.

The findings indicate that while WFH improves flexibility and task efficiency, employees continue to experience technological barriers, communication gaps, and work-life boundary challenges. WFO strengthens organizational connectedness and collaboration, whereas Hybrid work models provide the most effective balance between productivity, flexibility, and employee well-being. Statistical analysis further confirms a significant association between employees’ preferred office attendance and their perception of the ideal future work model.

The study contributes to the growing literature on flexible workplace structures within the Indian context and offers practical implications for organizations designing sustainable workforce strategies.

Keywords: Work-from-Home (WFH); Work-from-Office (WFO); Hybrid Work Model; Employee Productivity; Employee Engagement; Work-Life Balance; Employee Well-Being; Organizational Cost; Flexible Work Arrangements; Future of Work.