IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 6

Published on: June 2026

COMPARATIVE HUMAN RIGHTS FRAMEWORK: RECONCEPTUALISING HONOUR KILLINGS AS MULTIPLE VIOLATIONS OF MEN'S AND WOMEN'S RIGHTS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW AND ITS IMPACT ON INDIAN JURISPRUDENCE.

A. FATHIMA NIZRA

LLM Human Rights Law, [The Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University, School of Excellence in Law], Chennai, India

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Honor killings are, however, a combination of various human rights violations and the most serious, complicated caste and gender based violent practices recognised under international law. This research posits honour killings as transgressions of the basic rights of men and women alike, preserved in place due to patriarchal social structures, community watching and the complicity of institutions. The fact that it has mostly been conceived of as crime against women alone needs to be addressed, and the idea reconceptualised. The paper comprehensively traces the scope of violations against all range of rights under study and systematically addresses right to life and dignity and right to equality as well as right to personal liberty and liberty to marry freely and demonstrates rights being undermined by referencing a wide array of human rights instrument: The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women (DEVAW). It further analyses the jurisprudence of Indian courts on the issue and examine some prominent judgements of the Supreme Court of India where the courts slowly declared honour killings unconstitutional and asked the governments to take punitive and preventive steps. It analyses the adequacy of present penal provisions available under the Indian Penal Code and proposed Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and other legislative developments like the Prevention of Crimes in the Name of Honour and Tradition Bill. Finally, the paper comes to conclusion that although the present laws are directionally appropriate, without a strong implementing framework and targeted legislations, in the context of the gender-sensitive interpretation by the judiciary conforming with human rights standards they are unable to address the issue properly.

Keywords

Honour killings; international human rights law; CEDAW; Indian jurisprudence; gender-based violence; constitutional rights

How to Cite this Paper

NIZRA, A. F. (2026). Comparative Human Rights Framework: Reconceptualising Honour Killings as Multiple Violations of Men's and Women's Rights under International Law and Its Impact on Indian Jurisprudence.. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(6). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i6.275

NIZRA, A.. "Comparative Human Rights Framework: Reconceptualising Honour Killings as Multiple Violations of Men's and Women's Rights under International Law and Its Impact on Indian Jurisprudence.." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 6, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i6.275.

NIZRA, A.. "Comparative Human Rights Framework: Reconceptualising Honour Killings as Multiple Violations of Men's and Women's Rights under International Law and Its Impact on Indian Jurisprudence.." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 6 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i6.275.

Search & Index

References


  1. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). (2000). The State of World Population 2000: Lives Together, Worlds Apart — Men and Women in a Time of Change. UNFPA.

  2. Welchman, L., & Hossain, S. (Eds.). (2005). 'Honour': Crimes, Paradigms, and Violence against Women. Zed Books.

  3. Mayell, H. (2002). Thousands of women killed for family 'honour.' National Geographic News. https://news.nationalgeographic.com

  4. Shakti Vahini v. Union of India, (2018) 7 SCC 192.

  5. Abu-Lughod, L. (2011). Seductions of the 'honour crime.' Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 22(1), 17–63. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-1218238.

  6. Welchman, L., & Hossain, S. (2005). Introduction: 'Honour,' rights and wrongs. In L. Welchman & S. Hossain (Eds.), 'Honour': Crimes, Paradigms, and Violence against Women (pp. 1–23). Zed Books.

  7. Chowdhry, P. (2007). Contentious Marriages, Eloping Couples: Gender, Caste, and Patriarchy in Northern India. Oxford University Press.

  8. Das, V. (1995). Critical Events: An Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India. Oxford University Press.

  9. Human Rights Watch. (2010). Marry Before Your House is Ruined: Discrimination and Violence against Women in Pakistan. Human Rights Watch.

  10. UN Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women. (2002). Cultural Practices in the Family that Are Violent towards Women (E/CN.4/2002/83). United Nations.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: Jun 21 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top