IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 10

Published on: October 2026

DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF MULTI-AGENT HEALTHCARE ASSISTANCE FRAMEWORK USING LLM AND RAG

Pranjali Gopinath Salve

Dr.Archana.S. Vaidya

Department of Computer Engineering

Gokhale Education Society's R. H. Sapat College of Engineering, Management Studies and Research

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Medical clinics field a steady stream of routine questions about reports, appointments, symptoms, and medicines. Answering them quickly and correctly takes staff time that is often scarce, and patients are left waiting or puzzled by medical jargon. This paper reviews how researchers have approached the problem and then describes a multi-agent assistant built on Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). The literature survey covers more than fifty studies on traditional clinic support, conversational health agents, biomedical language models, medical question answering, RAG, LLM-based agents, evaluation, and safety. Together they show that general-purpose LLMs know a good deal of medicine but still invent facts, that retrieval from trusted sources lowers that risk, and that dividing the work among specialised agents makes an assistant easier to control. Building on these findings, the proposed system places a central orchestrator in front of five agents: medical question answering, medical document analysis, appointment management, symptom checking, and medicine information. Each agent draws on approved clinic knowledge, and every reply passes a safety review before reaching the patient. Quality is to be measured with ROUGE, BLEU, semantic similarity, and LLM-based judging, together with clinician review. The assistant supports routine communication and does not replace professional medical consultation.

Keywords—Medical clinics, large language models, retrieval-augmented generation, multi-agent AI, medical question answering, medical document analysis, symptom checker, medicine information, appointment management, healthcare AI

How to Cite this Paper

Salve, P. G. (2026). Design and Development of Multi-Agent Healthcare Assistance Framework Using LLM and RAG. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(10), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i10.235

Salve, Pranjali. "Design and Development of Multi-Agent Healthcare Assistance Framework Using LLM and RAG." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 10, 2026, pp. 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i10.235.

Salve, Pranjali. "Design and Development of Multi-Agent Healthcare Assistance Framework Using LLM and RAG." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 10 (2026): 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i10.235.

Search & Index

References


  • J. Thirunavukarasu et al., “Large language models in medicine,” Nature Medicine, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1930–1940, Aug. 2023.

  • J. Topol, “High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence,” Nature Medicine, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 44–56, Jan. 2019.

  • Singhal et al., “Large language models encode clinical knowledge,” Nature, vol. 620, pp. 172–180, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2.

  • Nori, N. King, S. M. McKinney, D. Carignan, and E. Horvitz, “Capabilities of GPT-4 on medical challenge problems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13375, 2023.

  • Lewis et al., “Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks,” in Proc. NeurIPS, vol. 33, 2020, pp. 9459–9474.

  • Wu et al., “AutoGen: Enabling next-gen LLM applications via multi-agent conversation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08155, 2023.

  • Guo et al., “Large language model based multi-agents: A survey of progress and challenges,” in Proc. Int. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell. (IJCAI), 2024, pp. 8048–8057.

  • -M. Tanasă, S.-V. Oprea, and A. Bâra, “Designing an architecture of a multi-agentic AI-powered virtual assistant using LLMs and RAG for a medical clinic,” Electronics, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 334, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.3390/electronics15020334.

  • L. Semigran, J. A. Linder, C. Gidengil, and A. Mehrotra, “Evaluation of symptom checkers for self diagnosis and triage: Audit study,” BMJ, vol. 351, p. h3480, 2015.

  • Laranjo et al., “Conversational agents in healthcare: A systematic review,” J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1248–1258, Sep. 2018.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • •All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • •Review follows editorial policy.
  • •Authors retain copyright.
  • •Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • •Published on: Nov 01 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top