IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 05

Published on: May 2026

DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF MULTI-AGENT AI SYSTEM FOR AUTONOMOUS DECISION MAKING

Satyam Kumar Swati Jaiswal

Sagar Choudhary

Department of CSE AI/ML, Quantum University, Roorkee, India

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Due to the rapid advancement in artificial intelligence technology, intelligent decision-making technology has gradually outperformed humans in many human versus machine contests, particularly in complex multi-agent collaborative task environments. In multi-agent collaboration decision-making, several agents cooperate to accomplish pre-defined tasks and realize certain goals. This technology can be applied in real-life scenarios like autonomous vehicles, drone navigation, disaster relief operations, and military confrontations simulations. This paper starts with a detailed review of the major simulation environments and platforms for multi-agent collaboration decision-making. We make a detailed analysis on the following aspects of these simulation environments: task format, reward distribution, and the technological base. Finally, we make an overall review of the intelligent decision-making methods and algorithms for multi-agent systems (MAS). They can generally be divided into five categories: rule-based (mainly fuzzy logic), game theory-based, evolutionary algorithm-based, deep MARL-based, and LLMs reasoning-based approaches. Considering that the MARL and LLMs-based decision-making approaches have a considerable edge over the conventional approaches like rule, game theory, and evolutionary algorithms, this paper aims to explore the multi-agent approaches based on MARL and LLMs. We offer a comprehensive review of such approaches, along with their methodologies, pros, and cons. Moreover, some future research directions related to multi-agent cooperative decision-making are also discussed.

Keywords:

Intelligent decision-making, Multi-agent systems, Multi-agent cooperative environments, Multi-agent reinforcement learning, Large language models.

How to Cite this Paper

Kumar, S. & Jaiswal, S. (2026). Design and Evaluation of Multi-Agent AI System for Autonomous Decision Making. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(05). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.749

Kumar, Satyam, and Swati Jaiswal. "Design and Evaluation of Multi-Agent AI System for Autonomous Decision Making." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 05, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.749.

Kumar, Satyam, and Swati Jaiswal. "Design and Evaluation of Multi-Agent AI System for Autonomous Decision Making." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 05 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.749.

Search & Index

References


URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.5602

URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14236

URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16961

  • Silver, J. Schrittwieser, K. Simonyan, I. Antonoglou,



  1. Huang, A. Guez, T. Hubert, L. Baker, M. Lai, A. Bolton, Y. Chen, T. Lillicrap, F. Hui, L. Sifre, G. van den Driessche, T. Graepel, D. Hassabis, Mastering the game of go without human knowledge, Nature 550 (7676) (2017) 354–359. doi:10.1038/nature24270. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24270



  • Li, K. Zhu, N. C. Luong, D. Niyato, Q. Wu, Y. Zhang, B. Chen, Applications of multi-agent reinforcement learning in future internet: A comprehensive survey, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 24 (2) (2022) 1240–1279. doi:


10.1109/COMST.2022.3160697.

895–943. doi:10.1007/s10462-021-09996-w.

URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-09996-w

 

URL https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/7/3625

 

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: May 24 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top