Published on: May 2026
DYNAMIC SAFETY INDEX-BASED SIMULATION OF ISO/TS 15066 SPEED AND SEPARATION MONITORING FOR COKITTING IN INDUSTRY 5.0
Sumedh Khot Ananya Nilakhe
PravinS.Gosavi
Article Status
Available Documents
Abstract
Keywords— Human-robot collaboration, ISO/TS 15066, Speed and Separation Monitoring, safety validation, GUI simulation, CoKitting, collaborative robotics, industrial safety.
How to Cite this Paper
Khot, S. & Nilakhe, A. (2026). Dynamic Safety Index-Based Simulation of ISO/TS 15066 Speed and Separation Monitoring for CoKitting in Industry 5.0. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(05). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.310
Khot, Sumedh, and Ananya Nilakhe. "Dynamic Safety Index-Based Simulation of ISO/TS 15066 Speed and Separation Monitoring for CoKitting in Industry 5.0." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 05, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.310.
Khot, Sumedh, and Ananya Nilakhe. "Dynamic Safety Index-Based Simulation of ISO/TS 15066 Speed and Separation Monitoring for CoKitting in Industry 5.0." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 05 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.310.
References
1] International Organization for Standardization, ISO/TS 15066:2016 Robots and robotic devices — Collaborative robots, Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.[2] Vicentini, M. Askarpour, M. M. Bersani, and M. Rossi, “Formal verification of collaborative robotics software for human safety,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 67, p. 102010, Feb. 2021.
[3] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 10218-1:2011 Robots and robotic devices — Safety requirements for industrial robots — Part 1: Robots, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
[4] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 10218-2:2011 Robots and robotic devices — Safety requirements for industrial robots — Part 2: Robot systems and integration, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
[5] P. A. Lasota, T. Fong, and J. A. Shah, “A survey of methods for safe human-robot interaction,” Foundations and Trends in Robotics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 261–349, 2017.
[6] C. Marvel, K. Nocross “problems of split brain research” Behavorial and brain Sciences ,1990,Vol 13, Issue 4, 10.1017/S0104525X00081234
[7] S. Robla-Gómez, V. M. Becerra, J. R. Llata, E. González-Sarabia, C. Torre-Ferrero, and J. Pérez-Oria, “Working together: A review on safe human-robot collaboration in industrial environments,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 26754–26773, 2017.
[8] B. Lacevic, P. Rocco, and A. M. Zanchettin, “Safety assessment and control of robotic manipulators: A review,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 715–735, Apr. 2022.
Ethical Compliance & Review Process
- •All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
- •Review follows editorial policy.
- •Authors retain copyright.
- •Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
- •Published on: May 10 2026
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

