IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 04

Published on: April 2026

EFFECTS OF PRINTING SPEED, INFILL DENSITY, AND LAYER THICKNESS ON THE TENSILE STRENGTH OF FDM-PRINTED PLA: EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION AND ANN MODELLING

Vipin Gopan Akash K. S Anwar Mohammed Praveen Prakash S. Sarath

Department of Mechanical Engineering

St. Thomas College of Engineering and Technology, Kozhuvalloor, Chengannur, Kerala, India

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Background: The tensile performance of fused deposition modelling components depends on thermal bonding, internal geometry, and deposition conditions. This study evaluated whether printing speed, infill density, and layer thickness could be used to improve the tensile strength of polylactic acid specimens and model the resulting response. Methods: ASTM D638-type tensile coupons were designed in SolidWorks, sliced in SuperSlicer, and printed on a Creality Ender 3 with 1.75 mm PLA and a 0.4 mm nozzle. A three-factor, three-level full factorial design generated 27 parameter combinations: printing speed of 40, 60, or 80 mm/s; infill density of 5, 10, or 15%; and layer thickness of 0.12, 0.20, or 0.28 mm. Tests were conducted on a 100 kN universal testing machine at 5 mm/min. A 3-4-1 feed-forward artificial neural network trained by the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm was used to estimate tensile strength. Results: Measured strength ranged from 8.76 to 17.46 MPa, with an overall mean of 13.58 MPa. Mean strength increased from 11.44 to 15.75 MPa across the investigated layer-thickness range and from 12.55 to 14.99 MPa across the infill-density range, whereas printing speed produced a smaller main-effect trend. For the 27 reported observations, model predictions achieved RMSE = 0.121 MPa, MAE = 0.081 MPa, R² = 0.9974, and r = 0.9987. The highest observed response occurred at 40 mm/s, 5% infill, and 0.28 mm layer thickness. Conclusions: Within the tested domain, layer thickness and infill density governed the principal response trends, and the neural network closely reproduced the available observations. Independent validation, raw replicate analysis, and a confirmation experiment are required before the reported setting can be generalized as an optimum.

Keywords: additive manufacturing; artificial neural network; fused deposition modelling; full factorial design; PLA; tensile strength

How to Cite this Paper

Gopan, V., S, A. K., Mohammed, A., Prakash, P. & Sarath, S. (2026). Effects of Printing Speed, Infill Density, and Layer Thickness on the Tensile Strength of FDM-Printed PLA: Experimental Evaluation and ANN Modelling. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(04), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.367

Gopan, Vipin, et al.. "Effects of Printing Speed, Infill Density, and Layer Thickness on the Tensile Strength of FDM-Printed PLA: Experimental Evaluation and ANN Modelling." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 04, 2026, pp. 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.367.

Gopan, Vipin,Akash S,Anwar Mohammed,Praveen Prakash, and S. Sarath. "Effects of Printing Speed, Infill Density, and Layer Thickness on the Tensile Strength of FDM-Printed PLA: Experimental Evaluation and ANN Modelling." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 04 (2026): 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.367.

Search & Index

References

[1] ISO/ASTM 52900:2021, Additive manufacturing - General principles - Fundamentals and vocabulary, ISO, Geneva, 2021.

[2] ASTM D638-22, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2022.

[3] S.-H. Ahn, M. Montero, D. Odell, S. Roundy, and P. K. Wright, “Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS,” Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 248-257, 2002, doi: 10.1108/13552540210441166.

[4] A. K. Sood, R. K. Ohdar, and S. S. Mahapatra, “Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts,” Materials & Design, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 287-295, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016.

[5] A. K. Sood, R. K. Ohdar, and S. S. Mahapatra, “Experimental investigation and empirical modelling of FDM process for compressive strength improvement,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 81-90, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2011.12.001.

[6] B. M. Tymrak, M. Kreiger, and J. M. Pearce, “Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions,” Materials & Design, vol. 58, pp. 242-246, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038.

[7] J. M. Chacón, M. A. Caminero, E. García-Plaza, and P. J. Núñez, “Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection,” Materials & Design, vol. 124, pp. 143-157, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065.

[8] A. Lanzotti, M. Grasso, G. Staiano, and M. Martorelli, “The impact of process parameters on mechanical properties of parts fabricated in PLA with an open-source 3-D printer,” Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 604-617, 2015, doi: 10.1108/RPJ-09-2014-0135.

[9] S. R. Rajpurohit and H. K. Dave, “Effect of process parameters on tensile strength of FDM printed PLA part,” Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1317-1324, 2018, doi: 10.1108/RPJ-06-2017-0134.

[10] M. Hikmat, S. Rostam, and Y. M. Ahmed, “Investigation of tensile property-based Taguchi method of PLA parts fabricated by FDM 3D printing technology,” Results in Engineering, vol. 11, art. 100264, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2021.100264.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • •All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • •Review follows editorial policy.
  • •Authors retain copyright.
  • •Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • •Published on: Apr 28 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top