IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 04

Published on: April 2026

EVALUATING CROSS-PLATFORM VS NATIVE MOBILE APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT: A PRACTICAL CASE STUDY

Dhruv Nileshkumar Panchal

B.tech ( Information Technology ) Gandhinagar Institute of technology

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

The way mobile application development is growing fast has brought about many different ways to develop mobile applications. These ways are mainly divided into two groups: -platform and native frameworks. When it comes to choosing the framework it is a very important decision that affects how well the mobile application works, how long it takes to develop what the users think of it and how well it can be scaled up. This paper is going to compare -platform frameworks, specifically React Native and Flutter, with developing mobile applications in the native way using Android with Java or Kotlin and iOS with Swift.


We are going to make some mobile applications using frameworks. The goal is to see which framework is the best. We will make the application with each framework so it is a fair test.We want to know things, like how it takes for the application to load, how well it works and how much memory it uses. We also want to know how hard it is to make the application and how big it's

How to Cite this Paper

Panchal, D. N. (2026). Evaluating Cross-Platform Vs Native Mobile Application Development: A Practical Case Study. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(04). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.456

Panchal, Dhruv. "Evaluating Cross-Platform Vs Native Mobile Application Development: A Practical Case Study." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 04, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.456.

Panchal, Dhruv. "Evaluating Cross-Platform Vs Native Mobile Application Development: A Practical Case Study." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 04 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.456.

Search & Index

References


  1. Willcox, “Comparing Cross-Platform Development Frameworks: React Native vs Flutter,” IEEE Software, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 82–88,

  2. Jul. 2020.

  3. Biørn-Hansen, T. A. Majchrzak, and T.-M. Grønli, “Progressive Web Apps: The Possible Web-Native Unifier for Mobile Development,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Web Eng. (ICWE), 2017,344–351.

  4. Facebook Inc., “React Native Documentation,” [Online]. Available: https://reactnative.dev/

  5. Google LLC, “Flutter Documentation,” [Online]. Available: https://flutter.dev/

  6. Android Developers, “Android Development Documentation,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://developer.android.com/

  7. Apple , “iOS Developer Documentation,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://developer.apple.com/

  8. Kaur and I. Kaur, “A Comparative Study of Android and iOS Mobile Application Development,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 179, no. 7, pp. 1–5, 2018.

  9. J. Gregory, “Evaluating the Performance of Cross-Platform Mobile Frameworks,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 123456–123465, 2020.

  10. Charland and B. Leroux, “Mobile Application Development: Web vs Native,” Commun. ACM, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 49–53, May2011.

  11. Palmieri, I. Singh, and A. Cicchetti, “Comparison of Cross-Platform Mobile Development Tools,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Mobile Services (MS), 2012, pp. 179–186.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: Apr 18 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top