IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 10

Published on: October 2026

MACHINE LEARNING AND DEEP LEARNING APPROACHES FOR FLOOD PREDICTION

Chetan Pathe Yash Borkar Purva Waghmare Rishita Dudhe Vaishali Chaudhari

Sushama Telrandhe

Department of Artificial Intelligence, Guru Nanak Institute of Engineering and Technology Nagpur,India

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Flooding remains one of the most damaging natural hazards worldwide, and the growing availability of hydrological sensor networks and satellite data has pushed researchers toward data-driven alternatives to conventional physics-based hydrological models. This paper synthesizes findings from six recent bodies of work — three literature reviews and three influential primary studies — covering the evolution of machine learning (ML) applications in flood and flash-flood forecasting, from early architecture benchmarking through real-world operational deployment to static susceptibility mapping. The synthesis traces the field's progression from early artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM) implementations toward the current dominance of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks and hybrid architectures that combine convolutional, recurrent, and physics-based components. Across the reviewed literature, meteorological and hydrological variables — principally rainfall and water level — account for the substantial majority of model inputs, while error-based metrics such as RMSE and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) remain the standard for performance evaluation. The synthesis also identifies recurring structural weaknesses in the field: a heavy geographic concentration of research in East and Southeast Asia, limited dataset sharing that constrains reproducibility, underused approaches such as graph neural networks and transfer learning, and insufficient attention to uncertainty quantification. The findings suggest that while data-driven flood forecasting has matured considerably in predictive capability, its transition into dependable operational early-warning systems still depends on resolving these gaps in transparency, generalizability, and interpretability.

Keywords— Flood forecasting; machine learning; deep learning; LSTM; hydrological modeling; hybrid models; flash floods.

How to Cite this Paper

Pathe, C., Borkar, Y., Waghmare, P., Dudhe, R. & Chaudhari, V. (2026). Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Flood Prediction. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(10), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i10.030

Pathe, Chetan, et al.. "Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Flood Prediction." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 10, 2026, pp. 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i10.030.

Pathe, Chetan,Yash Borkar,Purva Waghmare,Rishita Dudhe, and Vaishali Chaudhari. "Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Flood Prediction." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 10 (2026): 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i10.030.

Search & Index

References


  • Mosavi, P. Ozturk, and K. Chau, “Flood Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: Literature Review,” Water, vol. 10, no. 11, p. 1536, Oct. 2018.

  • B. L. Santos, E. V. Escobar-Silva, L. F. Satolo, R. S. Oyarzabal, M. M. Diniz, R. G. Negri,

  • R. T. Lima, S. Stephany, J. A. J. P. Soares, J. S. Duque, F. L. Saraiva Filho, A. N. Caseri, and L. Bacelar, “Machine learning-based hydrological models for flash floods: a systematic literature review,” Smart Construction and Sustainable Cities, vol. 3, no. 21, Oct. 2025.

  • Kuhaneswaran, G. Sorwar, A. R. Alaei, and Tong, “Evolution of Data-Driven Flood Forecasting: Trends, Technologies, and Gaps—A Systematic Mapping Study,” Water, vol. 17, no. 15, p. 2281, Jul. 2025.

  • Kratzert, D. Klotz, C. Brenner, K. Schulz, and M. Herrnegger, “Rainfall–runoff modelling using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 22, pp. 6005–6022, 2018.

  • Nevo, E. Morin, A. Gerzi Rosenthal, A. Metzger, C. Barshai, D. Weitzner, D. Voloshin, F. Kratzert, G. Elidan, G. Dror, et al., “Flood forecasting with machine learning models in an operational framework,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 26, no. 15, pp. 4013–4032, 2022.

  • S. Tehrany, B. Pradhan, and M. N. Jebur, “Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 512, pp. 332–343, 2014.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • •All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • •Review follows editorial policy.
  • •Authors retain copyright.
  • •Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • •Published on: Oct 07 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top