IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 8

Published on: August 2026

POLITICAL UNREST IN PAKISTAN-OCCUPIED KASHMIR: DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY, GOVERNANCE, AND REGIONAL SECURITY IN A CONTESTED TERRITORY.

Dr. Jewan Lal Dhar

Associate Professor in Political Science
Higher Education Department, Govt. of Jammu & Kashmir

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Political unrest in Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (POK) has intensified debate concerning democratic legitimacy, constitutional governance, electoral integrity, and regional security in South Asia. While existing scholarship largely examines POK within the India–Pakistan dispute, comparatively limited attention has been given to its internal political dynamics, institutional performance, and governance structures. This study addresses this gap through an integrated framework combining Democratic Legitimacy Theory, State Capacity Theory, Centre–Periphery Theory, and Conflict Transformation Theory.


The study employs a qualitative case study design based exclusively on secondary data, including constitutional documents, government publications, international reports, peer-reviewed scholarship, policy papers, and credible media sources. Documentary evidence is examined through qualitative content and thematic analysis, focusing on constitutional arrangements, governance performance, electoral contestation, institutional accountability, and state–society relations.


The findings indicate that contemporary political unrest in POK results not from isolated political events but from the interaction of governance deficits, contested constitutional arrangements, declining institutional trust, and perceptions of limited political responsiveness. Electoral legitimacy constitutes only one dimension of broader democratic legitimacy, while governance effectiveness significantly influences public confidence in political institutions. Constitutional ambiguity, administrative shortcomings, and competing political narratives further shape political mobilisation and institutional credibility.


The study also highlights the wider regional significance of political stability in contested territories. By integrating domestic governance, constitutional politics, and regional strategic dynamics, it contributes to comparative scholarship on contested territories, democratic governance, and conflict transformation. It further suggests that strengthening institutional accountability, inclusive participation, governance effectiveness, and constructive political dialogue is essential for sustainable political stability.


Keywords: Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (POK), democratic legitimacy, electoral contestation, governance, constitutional governance, state capacity, conflict transformation, regional security.

How to Cite this Paper

Dhar, J. L. (2026). Political unrest in Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir: Democratic Legitimacy, Governance, and Regional Security in a Contested Territory.. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(8), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i8.129

Dhar, Jewan. "Political unrest in Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir: Democratic Legitimacy, Governance, and Regional Security in a Contested Territory.." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 8, 2026, pp. 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i8.129.

Dhar, Jewan. "Political unrest in Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir: Democratic Legitimacy, Governance, and Regional Security in a Contested Territory.." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 8 (2026): 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i8.129.

Search & Index

References


  1. Ahmed, I. (2021). Electoral politics and democratic governance in Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Journal of Asian Political Studies, 15(2), 145–168.

  2. Amnesty International. (2024). Annual report 2023/24: Human rights around the world.

  3. Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act. (1974). Government of Azad Jammu and Kashmir.

  4. Bose, S. (2003). Kashmir: Roots of conflict, paths to peace. Harvard University Press.

  5. Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.

  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

  7. Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge University Press.

  8. Carothers, T. (2002). The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5–21.

  9. Cohen, S. P. (2004). The idea of Pakistan. Brookings Institution Press.

  10. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: Aug 22 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top