Published on: October 2026
SCHOLARFORGE AI: AN OPEN, MULTI-AGENT RAG PLATFORM FOR AUTOMATED RESEARCH PAPER ANALYSIS
Shravasti Chaudhari Akansha Mahore Tanmay Ranotkar Shravan Ningot
Dr. Maithili S. Deshmukh
Bandera, Maharashtra, India
Article Status
Available Documents
Abstract
How to Cite this Paper
Chaudhari, S., Mahore, A., Ranotkar, T. & Ningot, S. (2026). ScholarForge AI: An Open, Multi-Agent RAG Platform for Automated Research Paper Analysis. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(10), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i10.092
Chaudhari, Shravasti, et al.. "ScholarForge AI: An Open, Multi-Agent RAG Platform for Automated Research Paper Analysis." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 10, 2026, pp. 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i10.092.
Chaudhari, Shravasti,Akansha Mahore,Tanmay Ranotkar, and Shravan Ningot. "ScholarForge AI: An Open, Multi-Agent RAG Platform for Automated Research Paper Analysis." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 10 (2026): 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i10.092.
References
[1] P. Lewis, E. Perez, A. Piktus, F. Petroni, V. Karpukhin, N. Goyal, H. Küttler, M. Lewis, W.-T. Yih, T. Rocktäschel, S. Riedel, and D. Kiela, “Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2020, vol. 33, pp. 9459–9474.[2] G. Izacard and E. Grave, “Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answering,” in Proc. 16th Conf. of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), 2021, pp. 874–880.
[3] L. Wang, N. Yang, X. Huang, B. Jiao, L. Yang, D. Jiang, R. Majumder, and F. Wei, “Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-training,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.03533, 2022.
[4] M. Yasunaga, H. Ren, A. Bosselut, P. Liang, and J. Leskovec, “QA-GNN: Reasoning with Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Question Answering,” in Proc. 2021 Conf. of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL-HLT), 2021, pp. 535–546.
[5] S. Hong, X. Zheng, J. Chen, Y. Cheng, J. Wang, C. Zhang, Z. Wang, S. K. S. Yau, Z. Lin, L. Zhou, C. Ran, L. Xiao, and C. Wu, “MetaGPT: Meta Programming for a Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework,” in Proc. 12th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2024.
[6] M. Ostendorff, T. Ruas, T. Zesch, and G. Rehm, “Aspect-based Document Similarity for Research Papers,” in Proc. 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), 2020, pp. 6280–6295.
[7] Y. Luan, L. He, M. Ostendorf, and H. Hajishirzi, “Multi-Task Identification of Entities, Relations, and Coreference for Scientific Knowledge Graph Construction,” in Proc. 2018 Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 2018, pp. 3219–3232.
[8] I. Cachola, K. Lo, A. Cohan, and D. S. Weld, “TLDR: Extreme Summarization of Scientific Documents,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, 2020, pp. 4766–4777.
[9] M. Färber and A. Jatowt, “Citation Recommendation: Approaches and Datasets,” International Journal on Digital Libraries, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 375–405, 2020.
[10] A. Cohan, F. Dernoncourt, D. S. Kim, T. Bui, S. Kim, W. Chang, and N. Goharian, “A Discourse-Aware Attention Model for Abstractive Summarization of Long Documents,” in Proc. 2018 Conf. of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL-HLT), 2018, pp. 615–621.
Ethical Compliance & Review Process
- •All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
- •Review follows editorial policy.
- •Authors retain copyright.
- •Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
- •Published on: Oct 16 2026
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

