Published on: May 2026
SENT-X: A CONTEXT-AWARE AND EXPLAINABLE FRAMEWORK FOR SENTIMENT ANALYSIS WITH AUTHENTICITY VERIFICATION IN SOCIAL MEDIA
Tejas R Tejas S Kumaraswamy S
University of Visvesvaraya College of Engineering
Bangalore India
Article Status
Available Documents
Abstract
(2) susceptibility to bot-driven manipulation, and (3) absence of real-world context linking. Experimental evaluation on Twitter datasets demonstrates that Sent-X improves interpretability by 100% through feature-level explanations, enhances contextual awareness by over 90% via automated keyword-to-event map- ping, and reduces sentiment distortion from automated influence by approximately 60%. The modular architecture ensures scalability and maintainability while preserving computational efficiency. Results indicate that Sent-X provides more reliable and trustworthy insights for social media analytics compared to conventional approaches.
Index Terms—Sentiment Analysis, Explainable AI, Social Media Analytics, Bot Detection, Context-Aware Systems, NLP, Authenticity Verification
How to Cite this Paper
R, T., S, T. & S, K. (2026). Sent-X: A Context-Aware and Explainable Framework for Sentiment Analysis with Authenticity Verification in Social Media. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(05). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.523
R, Tejas, et al.. "Sent-X: A Context-Aware and Explainable Framework for Sentiment Analysis with Authenticity Verification in Social Media." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 05, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.523.
R, Tejas,Tejas S, and Kumaraswamy S. "Sent-X: A Context-Aware and Explainable Framework for Sentiment Analysis with Authenticity Verification in Social Media." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 05 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.523.
References
- Statista, “Number of social media users worldwide from 2017 to 2027,” Digital Market Outlook, 2024.
- Liu, “Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining,” Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-167, 2012.
- McCallum and K. Nigam, “A comparison of event models for naive Bayes text classification,” AAAI-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization, vol. 752, pp. 41-48, 1998.
- Joachims, “Text categorization with support vector machines: Learn- ing with many relevant features,” Proc. ECML, pp. 137-142, 1998.
- Devlin, M. W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” Proc. NAACL-HLT, pp. 4171-4186, 2019.
- B. Brown et al., “Language models are few-shot learners,” NeurIPS, vol. 33, pp. 1877-1901, 2020.
- Rudin, “Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead,” Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 206-215, 2019.
- Ferrara, O. Varol, C. Davis, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini, “The rise of social bots,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 96-104, 2016.
- Vosoughi, D. Roy, and S. Aral, “The spread of true and false news online,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6380, pp. 1146-1151, 2018.
- Giachanou and F. Crestani, “Like it or not: A survey of Twitter sentiment analysis methods,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 49, no. 2,1-41, 2016.
Ethical Compliance & Review Process
- •All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
- •Review follows editorial policy.
- •Authors retain copyright.
- •Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
- •Published on: May 16 2026
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

