IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 05

Published on: May 2026

SENT-X: A CONTEXT-AWARE AND EXPLAINABLE FRAMEWORK FOR SENTIMENT ANALYSIS WITH AUTHENTICITY VERIFICATION IN SOCIAL MEDIA

Tejas R Tejas S Kumaraswamy S

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

University of Visvesvaraya College of Engineering

Bangalore India

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Social media platforms have evolved into primary channels for public discourse, where users express opinions on brands, events, and socio-political issues. Traditional sentiment analysis systems focus predominantly on emotion classification while lacking transparency, authenticity verification, and contextual grounding. This paper presents Sent-X, a novel framework that integrates machine learning-based sentiment classification, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), automated content au- thenticity assessment, and web-based contextual exploration. The proposed system addresses three critical limitations of existing approaches: (1) lack of interpretability in predictions,

(2) susceptibility to bot-driven manipulation, and (3) absence of real-world context linking. Experimental evaluation on Twitter datasets demonstrates that Sent-X improves interpretability by 100% through feature-level explanations, enhances contextual awareness by over 90% via automated keyword-to-event map- ping, and reduces sentiment distortion from automated influence by approximately 60%. The modular architecture ensures scalability and maintainability while preserving computational efficiency. Results indicate that Sent-X provides more reliable and trustworthy insights for social media analytics compared to conventional approaches.

Index Terms—Sentiment Analysis, Explainable AI, Social Media Analytics, Bot Detection, Context-Aware Systems, NLP, Authenticity Verification

How to Cite this Paper

R, T., S, T. & S, K. (2026). Sent-X: A Context-Aware and Explainable Framework for Sentiment Analysis with Authenticity Verification in Social Media. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(05). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.523

R, Tejas, et al.. "Sent-X: A Context-Aware and Explainable Framework for Sentiment Analysis with Authenticity Verification in Social Media." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 05, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.523.

R, Tejas,Tejas S, and Kumaraswamy S. "Sent-X: A Context-Aware and Explainable Framework for Sentiment Analysis with Authenticity Verification in Social Media." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 05 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.523.

Search & Index

References


  1. Statista, “Number of social media users worldwide from 2017 to 2027,” Digital Market Outlook, 2024.

  2. Liu, “Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining,” Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-167, 2012.

  3. McCallum and K. Nigam, “A comparison of event models for naive Bayes text classification,” AAAI-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization, vol. 752, pp. 41-48, 1998.

  4. Joachims, “Text categorization with support vector machines: Learn- ing with many relevant features,” Proc. ECML, pp. 137-142, 1998.

  5. Devlin, M. W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” Proc. NAACL-HLT, pp. 4171-4186, 2019.

  6. B. Brown et al., “Language models are few-shot learners,” NeurIPS, vol. 33, pp. 1877-1901, 2020.

  7. Rudin, “Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead,” Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 206-215, 2019.

  8. Ferrara, O. Varol, C. Davis, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini, “The rise of social bots,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 96-104, 2016.

  9. Vosoughi, D. Roy, and S. Aral, “The spread of true and false news online,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6380, pp. 1146-1151, 2018.

  10. Giachanou and F. Crestani, “Like it or not: A survey of Twitter sentiment analysis methods,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 49, no. 2,1-41, 2016.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: May 16 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top