IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 10

Published on: October 2026

SMART CITIES VS. SMART CITIZENS: THE GAP BETWEEN POLICY PROMISES AND LIVED REALITIES IN URBAN INDIA

Komal Vithlani

Dr. Prateek Kanchan

B.K School of Professional and Management Studies, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad-380009

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

The Smart Cities Mission (SCM), launched by the Government of India in 2015, aims to improve urban governance and citizens' quality of life through technology-driven development. This study examines the gap between the policy promises of the Smart Cities Mission and the documented lived realities of citizens across four Indian cities namely Delhi, Bengaluru, Kolkata, and Ahmedabad. Guided by an interpretivist paradigm, the research adopts a qualitative multiple-case study design using documentary evidence from government policy documents, Smart City Proposals, Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) reports, peer-reviewed journal articles, and international institutional publications. Data were analysed using Interpretive Policy Analysis, documentary analysis, and thematic analysis. The study develops and applies the Citizen-Centred Governance Framework (CCGF) to evaluate governance responsiveness, citizen participation, spatial justice, and policy implementation. The findings reveal that although the Smart Cities Mission has strengthened digital infrastructure and urban modernization, these developments have not consistently resulted in inclusive and citizen-centred outcomes. Limited public participation, uneven service delivery, weak institutional coordination, and spatial inequalities continue to influence implementation across the selected cities. The study concludes that successful smart city development depends not only on technology but also on responsive governance, democratic accountability, and meaningful citizen participation. The proposed CCGF offers a practical framework for evaluating and strengthening citizen-centred urban governance in India.

Keywords: Smart Cities Mission, Citizen-Centred Governance, Urban Governance, Policy–Reality Gap, Interpretive Policy Analysis, India.

How to Cite this Paper

Vithlani, K. (2026). Smart Cities vs. Smart Citizens: The Gap Between Policy Promises and Lived Realities in Urban India. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(10), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i10.052

Vithlani, Komal. "Smart Cities vs. Smart Citizens: The Gap Between Policy Promises and Lived Realities in Urban India." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 10, 2026, pp. 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i10.052.

Vithlani, Komal. "Smart Cities vs. Smart Citizens: The Gap Between Policy Promises and Lived Realities in Urban India." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 10 (2026): 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i10.052.

Search & Index

References

Anthopoulos, L. G. (2017). Smart utopia? Smart city strategy, smart city development and socio-economic realities. Cities, 63, 128–148.

Batty, M. (2013). The new science of cities. MIT Press.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Cardullo, P., & Kitchin, R. (2019). Being a "citizen" in the smart city: Up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation. GeoJournal, 84(1), 1–13.

Comptroller and Auditor General of India. (2024). Performance audit on implementation of the Smart Cities Mission. Government of India.

Datta, A. (2015). New urban utopias of postcolonial India: "Entrepreneurial urbanization" in Dholera Smart City, Gujarat. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5(1), 3–22.

Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A., & Nam, T. (2016). Smarter as the new urban agenda: A comprehensive view of the 21st century city. Springer.

Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2014). Implementing public policy (3rd ed.). Sage.

Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? City, 12(3), 303–320.

Joss, S., Sengers, F., Schraven, D., Caprotti, F., & Dayot, Y. (2019). The smart city as global discourse: Storylines and critical junctures across 27 cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 26(1), 3–34.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • •All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • •Review follows editorial policy.
  • •Authors retain copyright.
  • •Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • •Published on: Oct 10 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top