IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 04

Published on: April 2026

THE EVOLVING THREAT LANDSCAPE OF ONLINE BANKING: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CYBERSECURITY CHALLENGES AND MITIGATIONS

Adarsh Sharma Manish Kumar Manisha Sharma

Dr. Deepshikha Aggarwal

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

The digitization of global finance has fundamentally restructured how society interacts with money, transitioning from physical branch-based transactions to ubiquitous, instantaneous digital ecosystems. Consequently, online banking platforms have emerged as one of the most lucrative and heavily besieged targets for global cybercriminal syndicates, state-sponsored actors, and opportunistic hackers. This paper provides a comprehensive, comparative analysis of the contemporary cybersecurity hurdles endemic to modern digital banking architectures. By deconstructing the anatomy of prevalent cyberattacks, we evaluate the efficacy and resilience of both legacy and modern defensive paradigms. We extensively explore the mechanics of primary threat vectors—including sophisticated phishing campaigns, polymorphic malware, Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS), and advanced Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) interceptions. Furthermore, this study highlights how the proliferation of Open Banking, the integration of third-party Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), and the persistent vulnerability of human psychology exponentially expand the attack surface. We critically examine the evolution of authentication mechanisms, contrasting the inherent fragility of knowledge-based systems (like traditional static passwords) with the robust frameworks of Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), behavioral biometrics, and cryptographic hardware tokens.

How to Cite this Paper

Sharma, A., Kumar, M. & Sharma, M. (2026). The Evolving Threat Landscape of Online Banking: A Comparative Analysis of Cybersecurity Challenges and Mitigations. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(04). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.630

Sharma, Adarsh, et al.. "The Evolving Threat Landscape of Online Banking: A Comparative Analysis of Cybersecurity Challenges and Mitigations." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 04, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.630.

Sharma, Adarsh,Manish Kumar, and Manisha Sharma. "The Evolving Threat Landscape of Online Banking: A Comparative Analysis of Cybersecurity Challenges and Mitigations." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 04 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i4.630.

Search & Index

References


  1. Schneier, Secrets and Lies: Digital Security in a Networked World. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.

  2. Egele, T. Scholte, E. Kirda, and C. Kruegel, "A survey on automated dynamic malware-analysis techniques and tools," ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 1-42, Feb. 2012. doi: 10.1145/2089125.2089126.

  3. F. Cranor, "A framework for reasoning about the human in the loop," in Proc. 1st Conf. Usability, Psychology, and Security (UPSEC), San Francisco, CA, USA, Apr. 2008, pp. 1-15.

  4. Ablon, M. C. Libicki, and A. A. Golay, Markets for Cybercrime Tools and Stolen Data. Santa Monica, CA, USA: RAND Corporation, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR610.html. doi: 10.7249/RR610.

  5. Goundar and K. Bhardwaj, "Security of APIs in Open Banking," in 2019 Int. Conf. on Cyber Security and Protection of Digital Services (Cyber Security), Oxford, UK, 2019, pp. 1-6. doi: 10.1109/CyberSecPODS.2019.8884935.

  6. A. Grassi, M. E. Garcia, and J. L. Fenton, "Digital Identity Guidelines: Authentication and Lifecycle Management," National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD, USA, NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-63B, Jun. 2017. doi: 10.6028/NIST.SP.800-63b.

  7. FIDO Alliance, "How FIDO standards protect against phishing and credential stuffing," FIDO Alliance White Paper, Mar. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://fidoalliance.org/white-paper-how-fido-standards-protect-against-phishing-and-credential-stuffing/

  8. Rose, O. Borchert, S. Mitchell, and S. Connelly, "Zero Trust Architecture," National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD, USA, NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-207, Aug. 2020. doi: 10.6028/NIST.SP.800-207.

  9. K. Jain, K. Nandakumar, and A. Ross, "50 years of biometric research: Accomplishments, challenges, and opportunities," Pattern Recognit. Lett., vol. 79, pp. 80-105, Aug. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2015.12.013.

  10. Das, T. F. Yen, M. Sharif, L. Bauer, and N. Christin, "The role of generative AI in sophisticated phishing attacks and mitigations," IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 18, pp. 2345-2358, 2023. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2023.3265543.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: Apr 24 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top