Published on: May 2026
VALUATION ACCURACY OF DCF VS. COMPARABLE COMPANY ANALYSIS VS. PRECEDENT TRANSACTIONS: EVIDENCE FROM M&A DEAL OUTCOMES IN EMERGING MARKETS (2015–2024)
B. Abhilash K. Rakesh Kumar Reddy C. Ruthvik Reddy
Dr. B. Raghava Reddy
Article Status
Available Documents
Abstract
This research examines the valuation accuracy of DCF, Comparable Company Analysis, and Precedent Transactions in predicting merger and acquisition outcomes across emerging markets between 2015 and 2024. The study analyses selected M&A transactions from India, Brazil, South Africa, Indonesia, and Mexico. The research compares the estimated valuation produced by each method with actual transaction values and post-merger performance indicators.
The study adopts a descriptive and analytical research design using both primary interpretations and secondary financial data collected from annual reports, Bloomberg summaries, investment banking reports, PwC reports, Deloitte publications, and stock exchange disclosures. Statistical tools including Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), correlation analysis, and comparative variance analysis are applied to evaluate valuation accuracy.
The findings indicate that DCF provides strong long-term valuation accuracy when reliable cash flow projections are available, but its effectiveness declines in highly volatile markets. Comparable Company Analysis performs better in industries with strong peer comparability and transparent market pricing. Precedent Transactions capture real market sentiment and acquisition premiums but are influenced by temporary market cycles and strategic motivations. Overall, the research concludes that no single valuation method is universally superior in emerging markets. A blended valuation approach combining DCF, CCA, and PTA produces the most balanced and realistic valuation estimates.
Keywords: Discounted Cash Flow, Comparable Company Analysis, Precedent Transactions, Emerging Markets, Mergers and Acquisitions, Valuation Accuracy, Corporate Finance.
How to Cite this Paper
Abhilash, B., Reddy, K. R. K. & Reddy, C. R. (2026). Valuation Accuracy of DCF Vs. Comparable Company Analysis Vs. Precedent Transactions: Evidence from M&A Deal Outcomes in Emerging Markets (2015–2024). International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(05). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.457
Abhilash, B., et al.. "Valuation Accuracy of DCF Vs. Comparable Company Analysis Vs. Precedent Transactions: Evidence from M&A Deal Outcomes in Emerging Markets (2015–2024)." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 05, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.457.
Abhilash, B.,K. Reddy, and C. Reddy. "Valuation Accuracy of DCF Vs. Comparable Company Analysis Vs. Precedent Transactions: Evidence from M&A Deal Outcomes in Emerging Markets (2015–2024)." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 05 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.457.
References
- Damodaran, A. (2018). Applied Corporate Finance. Wiley Publications.
- Koller, T., Goedhart, M., & Wessels, D. (2020). Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. McKinsey & Company.
- Fernandez, P. (2021). Company Valuation Methods. IESE Business School Working Paper.
- PwC Global M&A Industry Trends Report. (2023).
- Deloitte Emerging Market Transactions Survey. (2022).
- Ernst & Young Corporate Finance Review. (2021).
- IMF World Economic Outlook Database. (2024).
- Bloomberg M&A Transactions Database. (2024).
- World Bank Emerging Market Investment Report. (2023).
- Harvard Business Review. Mergers and Acquisitions Performance Studies.
- McKinsey Global Institute. Emerging Markets and Corporate Valuation. (2022).
- CFA Institute Research Foundation. Equity Valuation in Emerging Markets. (2020).
- Discounted Cash Flow Analysis.
- NSE India Corporate Filings.
- BSE India Financial Reports.
Ethical Compliance & Review Process
- •All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
- •Review follows editorial policy.
- •Authors retain copyright.
- •Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
- •Published on: May 15 2026
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

