Published on: June 2026
FAKESCHOLAR: A MULTIMODAL DEEP LEARNING FRAMEWORK FOR DETECTING FRAUDULENT ACADEMIC RESEARCH
Mahak Keshav Prabhakar Priyanka Sharma Tanushka Gupta
Dr. Shiv Kumar Sharma
Article Status
Available Documents
Abstract
Index Terms—academic fraud detection, multimodal deep learning, citation graph analysis, AI-generated text detection, SciBERT, graph neural networks, paper mills
How to Cite this Paper
Mahak, , Prabhakar, K., Sharma, P. & Gupta, T. (2026). FakeScholar: A Multimodal Deep Learning Framework for Detecting Fraudulent Academic Research. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(6). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i6.262
Mahak, , et al.. "FakeScholar: A Multimodal Deep Learning Framework for Detecting Fraudulent Academic Research." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 6, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i6.262.
Mahak, ,Keshav Prabhakar,Priyanka Sharma, and Tanushka Gupta. "FakeScholar: A Multimodal Deep Learning Framework for Detecting Fraudulent Academic Research." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 6 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i6.262.
References
- Oransky and A. Marcus, “Retraction Watch,” 2010. [Online]. Avail-able: https://retractionwatch.com
- P. A. Ioannidis, “Why most published research findings are false,” PLOS Medicine, vol. 2, no. 8, p. e124, Aug. 2005.
- M. Bik, A. Casadevall, and F. C. Fang, “The prevalence of inap-propriate image duplication in biomedical research publications,” mBio, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. e00809-16, May/Jun. 2016.
- Else, “How this paper mill detected 400 potentially fake cancer papers,” Nature, vol. 591, pp. 19–20, Mar. 2021.
- A. Byrne and J. Christopher, “Digital magic or sleight of hand? Lessons learned from the paper mill phenomenon and potential futures for the academic publishing system,” Research Integrity and Peer Review, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 22, Nov. 2020.
- Van Noorden, “Publishers: Stem the tide of fake academic papers,” Nature, vol. 603, pp. 206–207, Mar. 2022.
- OpenAI, “GPT-4 technical report,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023.
- Demir, “Hallucinated but authoritative: The epistemic risks of AI-authored academic manuscripts,” Accountability in Research, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 134–151, 2024.
- Tian, “GPTZero: Towards detection of AI-generated text using zero-shot and supervised methods,” GPTZero Technical Report, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://gptzero.me
- Turnitin LLC, “Turnitin AI writing detection,” Turnitin White Paper, [Online]. Available: https://www.turnitin.com/solutions/ai-writing
Ethical Compliance & Review Process
- •All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
- •Review follows editorial policy.
- •Authors retain copyright.
- •Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
- •Published on: Jun 20 2026
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

