IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 7

Published on: July 2026

INFLUENCE OF SUPPLEMENTARY CEMENTITIOUS MATERIALS ON THE STRENGTH AND SELECTED DURABILITY PARAMETERS OF CONCRETE A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF 41 MIXTURES

Palakurthi Ramya

Mr. Mohammed Atharuddin

Department of Civil Engineering, GIET, Hyderabad, India

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Conventional concrete specification relies heavily on compressive strength, water-to-binder ratio, minimum cement content, and nominal cover, none of which directly measures the resistance of hardened concrete to chloride ingress, gas penetration, or capillary water absorption. This study reports a comparative experimental investigation of 41 concrete mixtures incorporating Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), two sources of Ground Granulated Blast-furnace Slag (Slag), Class F fly ash, and Class C fly ash at replacement levels of 15–70%, together with binary and ternary combinations, across water-to-binder ratios of 0.35–0.50 and binder contents of 350–450 kg/m³. Compressive strength, surface electrical resistivity, rapid chloride penetration (RCPT) charge, oxygen permeability index (OPI), and water sorptivity were measured at 28 and 90 days. Mean compressive strength increased by 16.7% between 28 and 90 days, mean surface resistivity increased by 79.9%, and mean RCPT charge decreased by 27.9%. Surface resistivity and RCPT charge were strongly and inversely correlated at both ages (r = −0.704 at 28 days; r = −0.725 at 90 days), whereas compressive strength showed only a weak association with RCPT (r = −0.258) and an essentially negligible association with resistivity (r = +0.008) at 90 days. In a controlled comparison at w/b = 0.50 and 310 kg/m³ binder content, a 50% slag mixture achieved the most balanced performance, exceeding the OPC control in strength (59.23 vs. 54.62 MPa) while improving resistivity by 7.38×, RCPT resistance by 6.40×, and sorptivity resistance by 3.03×. A 50% Class F fly ash mixture achieved comparable or superior chloride-related resistance (RCPT resistance 7.17×) but at a substantial strength penalty (0.57× the OPC strength). The results demonstrate that compressive strength alone cannot rank the durability performance of SCM concretes, and that a multi-parameter, exposure-specific assessment framework combining resistivity, RCPT, OPI, and sorptivity is required for dependable material selection.

Keywords: Supplementary cementitious materials; Concrete durability; Surface electrical resistivity; Rapid chloride penetration; Oxygen permeability index; Water sorptivity; Correlation analysis.

How to Cite this Paper

Ramya, P. (2026). Influence of Supplementary Cementitious Materials on the Strength and Selected Durability Parameters of Concrete a Comparative Study of 41 Mixtures. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(7), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i7.210

Ramya, Palakurthi. "Influence of Supplementary Cementitious Materials on the Strength and Selected Durability Parameters of Concrete a Comparative Study of 41 Mixtures." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 7, 2026, pp. 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i7.210.

Ramya, Palakurthi. "Influence of Supplementary Cementitious Materials on the Strength and Selected Durability Parameters of Concrete a Comparative Study of 41 Mixtures." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 7 (2026): 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i7.210.

Search & Index

References

[1] Abd El-Fattah, H., Abd El-Zaher, Y., and Kohail, M. (2024). A study of chloride binding capacity of concrete containing supplementary cementitious materials. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 12970.

[2] Aziz, F., et al. (2024). Optimisation of blended supplementary cementitious materials in self-compacting concrete. [journal details per thesis source].

[3] Ahmed, S. (2024). Effects of supplementary cementitious materials on concrete properties: A review. [journal details per thesis source].

[4] Wei, J., et al. (2024). Chloride-ion binding of cement mortars containing mineral admixtures. [journal details per thesis source].

[5] von Greve-Dierfeld, S., Lothenbach, B., Vollpracht, A., et al. (2020). Understanding the carbonation of concrete with supplementary cementitious materials: A critical review by RILEM TC 281-CCC. Materials and Structures, 53, Article 136.

[6] Papadakis, V. G. (2000). Effect of supplementary cementing materials on concrete resistance against carbonation and chloride ingress. Cement and Concrete Research, 30(2), 291–299.

[7] Thomas, M. D. A., Hooton, R. D., Scott, A., and Zibara, H. (2012). The effect of supplementary cementitious materials on chloride binding in hardened cement paste. Cement and Concrete Research, 42(1), 1–7.

[8] Lollini, F., Redaelli, E., and Bertolini, L. (2016). Investigation on the effect of supplementary cementitious materials on the critical chloride threshold of steel in concrete. Materials and Structures, 49, 4147–4165.

[9] Ghosh, P., and Tran, Q. (2015). Correlation between bulk and surface resistivity of concrete. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 9, 119–132.

[10] Alexander, M. G., Ballim, Y., and Stanish, K. (2008). A framework for use of durability indexes in performance-based design and specifications for reinforced concrete structures. Materials and Structures, 41, 921–936.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: Jul 22 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top