IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 8

Published on: August 2026

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF DEEP NEURAL MODELS FOR PARKINSON’S DISEASE MONITORING USING MULTIMODAL WEARABLE SENSOR DATA

Jakkula Sailaja Y.Sravanthi Kakani Anusha

Department of Computer Science / Stanley Engineering College for Women/ Osmania University, Hyderabad,India
DOI:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i8.155

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Download PDF Review Report

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurological disorder for which continuous observation of motor and non-motor manifestations can support clinical assessment and long-term disease management. This study examines multimodal wearable sensor data and deep neural models for PD-related pattern analysis in a home-oriented monitoring setting. The framework integrates accelerometer, electromyography (EMG), gyroscope, and acoustic measurements with edge-level processing using a Raspberry Pi platform and wireless communication. Sensor observations collected during structured daily activities were used to compare convolutional, recurrent, and autoencoder-based deep-learning approaches reported in the source study. The primary experimental cohort reported in the methodology consisted of 50 participants, including 35 individuals with PD and 15 control participants. The source manuscript reports performance values between 97.8% and 99.8%; however, the final manuscript must explicitly define the metric and validation protocol supporting these values. The findings demonstrate the potential of multimodal sensing and deep learning for continuous PD monitoring while emphasizing that algorithmic outputs are decision-support signals rather than substitutes for clinical diagnosis.

How to Cite this Paper

Sailaja, J., Y.Sravanthi, & Anusha, K. (2026). Comparative Evaluation of Deep Neural Models for Parkinson’s Disease Monitoring Using Multimodal Wearable Sensor Data. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(8), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i8.155

Sailaja, Jakkula, et al.. "Comparative Evaluation of Deep Neural Models for Parkinson’s Disease Monitoring Using Multimodal Wearable Sensor Data." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 8, 2026, pp. 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i8.155.

Sailaja, Jakkula, Y.Sravanthi, and Kakani Anusha. "Comparative Evaluation of Deep Neural Models for Parkinson’s Disease Monitoring Using Multimodal Wearable Sensor Data." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 8 (2026): 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i8.155.

Search & Index

Google Scholar Crossref DOI ResearchGate

References


  1. A. Abos et al., “Discriminating cognitive status in Parkinson’s disease through functional connectomics and machine learning,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, 45347, 2017.

  2. S. Aich et al., “A supervised machine learning approach using different feature selection techniques on voice datasets for prediction of Parkinson’s disease,” in Proc. ICACT, 2019, pp. 1116–1121.

  3. K. Vuppula, “Computer-aided diagnosis for diseases using machine learning,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 4, no. 12, 2020.

  4. R. Sirisati et al., “An enhanced multi-layer neural network to detect early cardiac arrests,” in Proc. ICECA, 2021.

  5. F. A. M. Al-Yarimi et al., “Feature optimization by discrete weights for heart disease prediction using supervised learning,” Soft Computing, vol. 25, pp. 1821–1831, 2021.

  6. H. Alashwal et al., “The application of unsupervised clustering methods to Alzheimer’s disease,” Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, vol. 13, p. 31, 2019.

  7. J. S. Albus, Brains, Behaviour and Robotics. BYTE Publications, 1981.

  8. T. N. Alotaiby et al., “EEG seizure detection and prediction algorithms: A survey,” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2014.

  9. T. Anagnostou et al., “Artificial neural networks for decision-making in urologic oncology,” European Urology, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 596–603, 2003.

  10. W. L. Anderson and J. M. Wiener, “The impact of assistive technologies on formal and informal home care,” The Gerontologist, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 422–433, 2015.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • •All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • •Review follows editorial policy.
  • •Authors retain copyright.
  • •Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • •Published on: Aug 19 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Back to Volume 02, Issue 8View All Issues Next Article

← Previous Article

Cloud Seeding: The Future of Weather Modification Technology

Next Article →

Comparative Study of the Youtube Trending Patterns in Current Digital Culture and the Effects of Changes in Ranking Algorithms on the Datasets Over the Last Ten Years
Scroll to Top