IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 05

Published on: May 2026

A STUDY ON BEHAVIORAL FACTORS INFLUENCING INVESTMENT PREFERENCES AMONG GEN Z INVESTORS WITH REFERENCE TO AHMEDABAD

Yashavi Vora

Jhanvi Betai

B.K. School of Professional and Management Studies (DPPG),
Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat (India)

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

This paper investigates the behavioral and psychological factors that shape investment preferences among Generation Z (Gen Z) investors in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. Drawing on primary data from 263 respondents aged 18–27, the study employs multiple regression analysis, chi-square testing, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation analysis to measure the influence of five key behavioral constructs — risk tolerance, overconfidence bias, herd behaviour, loss aversion, and emotional influence — on investment choices across five avenues: fixed deposits (FDs), mutual funds (MFs), shares/equities, gold, and Bitcoin/cryptocurrency. Grounded in Prospect Theory (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979), Heuristics and Biases Theory (Tversky and Kahneman, 1974), the Theory of Planned Behaviour (Ajzen, 1991), and Mental Accounting Theory (Thaler, 1985), the study reveals that Gen Z investment decisions deviate significantly from rational financial models. Statistical results confirm that all five behavioral factors significantly influence investment preferences, with emotional reactions and herd behaviour emerging as particularly prominent drivers. Risk-tolerant individuals gravitate toward equities and cryptocurrencies, while loss-averse respondents prefer safer instruments such as fixed deposits. The study contributes city-specific empirical evidence to the behavioral finance literature, filling a gap in Indian regional research, and offers actionable recommendations for investors, financial advisors, fintech platforms, and policymakers seeking to foster more rational financial decision-making among India's youngest investor cohort.

Keywords: Behavioral Finance, Gen Z, Investment Preferences, Overconfidence Bias, Herd Behaviour, Loss Aversion, Ahmedabad

How to Cite this Paper

Vora, Y. (2026). A Study on Behavioral Factors Influencing Investment Preferences Among Gen Z Investors with Reference to Ahmedabad. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(05). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.779

Vora, Yashavi. "A Study on Behavioral Factors Influencing Investment Preferences Among Gen Z Investors with Reference to Ahmedabad." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 05, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.779.

Vora, Yashavi. "A Study on Behavioral Factors Influencing Investment Preferences Among Gen Z Investors with Reference to Ahmedabad." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 05 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.779.

Search & Index

References


  1. Aditya Pratama, R. and Hendra, S. (2023) 'The Psychological and Educational Drivers of Investment Decisions: A Study on Gen Y and Gen Z in Batam City', Journal of Behavioral Finance, 24(3), pp. 112–128.

  2. Ajzen, I. (1991) 'The Theory of Planned Behaviour', Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), pp. 179–211.

  3. AMFI (2023) Mutual Fund Industry Data: Annual Report 2022–23. Mumbai: Association of Mutual Funds in India.

  4. Barber, B.M. and Odean, T. (2001) 'Boys Will Be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment', Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), pp. 261–292.

  5. Bikhchandani, S. and Sharma, S. (2001) 'Herd Behaviour in Financial Markets', IMF Staff Papers, 47(3), pp. 279–310.

  6. Creswell, J.W. (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  7. Dimock, M. (2019) Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begin. Washington, DC: Pew Research Centre.

  8. Fama, E.F. (1970) 'Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Empirical Work', Journal of Finance, 25(2), pp. 383–417.

  9. Grable, J.E. and Lytton, R.H. (1999) 'Financial Risk Tolerance Revisited: The Development of a Risk Assessment Instrument', Financial Services Review, 8(3), pp. 163–181.

  10. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) 'Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk', Econometrical, 47(2), pp. 263–291.

  11. Kumari, P. and Rana, A. (2024) 'Do Emotions Drive Money? An Empirical Study on Behavioural Biases Among Gen Z Investors', Indian Journal of Finance, 18(4), pp. 56–74.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: May 27 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top