IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 05

Published on: May 2026

AN ADAPTIVE AND EXPLAINABLE FRAUD DETECTION FRAMEWORK USING ENSEMBLE LEARNING AND LLM-BASED SEMANTIC EXPLANATIONS FOR REAL-TIME BFSI SYSTEMS

H B S Bharath Kumar

Dr. C. Krishna Priya

Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Central University of Andhra Pradesh

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Detecting fraud in the digital financial system poses challenges as the types of fraud, imbalanced data, and lack of transparency of machine learning models are not handled properly. The static rule-based methods do not adapt to fraud types, whereas the machine learning models act like a black- box. This paper introduces a hybrid, adaptive and explainable fraud detection framework by combining ensemble learning, behavioral feature engineering and rule-based decision making process. Random Forest, AdaBoost and LightGBM are utilized for prediction probability generation, which is enriched using a hybrid risk-based decision framework. Class imbalance is tackled with SMOTE and an adaptive threshold technique is used for dynamic control of precision and recall, without any retraining. Feature-level explainability is achieved using SHAP and the LLM generates human understandable explanations. The framework is put to use using FastAPI, which provides near real time processing and experimental evaluation results prove its significance for BFSI real-world applications by providing accuracy of 95.15% and AUC of 0.9926.

Index Terms—Fraud Detection, Ensemble Learning, Explain- able Artificial Intelligence (XAI), SHAP, Large Language Mod- els (LLM), SMOTE, Adaptive Thresholding, Hybrid Decision Framework, Behavioral Feature Engineering, BFSI, Real-Time Systems.

How to Cite this Paper

Kumar, H. B. S. B. (2026). An Adaptive and Explainable Fraud Detection Framework Using Ensemble Learning and LLM-Based Semantic Explanations for Real-Time BFSI Systems. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(05). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.121

Kumar, H. "An Adaptive and Explainable Fraud Detection Framework Using Ensemble Learning and LLM-Based Semantic Explanations for Real-Time BFSI Systems." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 05, 2026, pp. . doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.121.

Kumar, H. "An Adaptive and Explainable Fraud Detection Framework Using Ensemble Learning and LLM-Based Semantic Explanations for Real-Time BFSI Systems." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 05 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i5.121.

Search & Index

References


  1. Phua et al., “A comprehensive survey of data mining-based fraud detection research,” Artificial Intelligence Review, 2010.

  2. Whitrow et al., “Transaction aggregation as a strategy for credit card fraud detection,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2009.

  3. W. T. Ngai et al., “The application of data mining techniques in financial fraud detection,” Decision Support Systems, 2011.

  4. Breiman, “Random forests,” Machine Learning, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5–32, 2001.

  5. Freund and R. E. Schapire, “A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting,” Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 1997.

  6. Ke et al., “Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017.

  7. Psychoula et al., “Explainable machine learning for fraud detection,” IEEE Computer, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 49–59, 2021.

  8. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee, “A unified approach to interpreting model predictions,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017.

  9. Guidotti et al., “A survey of methods for explaining black box models,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 51, no. 5, 2018.

  10. V. Chawla, K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, and W. P. Kegelmeyer, “Smote: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique,” Journal of Artificial Intel- ligence Research, vol. 16, pp. 321–357, 2002.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: May 06 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top