IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 8

Published on: August 2026

DEVELOPMENT OF AN AI-BASED STATISTICAL CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT MODEL FOR EARLY DETECTION OF HIGH-RISK PATIENTS IN COMMUNITY NURSING

Pranjal Kaser Nishi Kashyap Madhuri Nair Shraddha Pradeep Kumar

Govt. College of Nursing, Rajnandgaon, C.G., India.

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

Early identification of high-risk patients is one of the most important responsibilities of community nursing because timely intervention reduces disease progression, hospitalization, healthcare costs, and mortality. Traditional risk assessment methods often rely on manual scoring systems and subjective clinical judgment, which may fail to detect subtle relationships among multiple patient characteristics. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and statistical learning provide opportunities to develop intelligent Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) capable of accurately identifying individuals at high risk.

The present study proposes an AI-based Statistical Clinical Decision Support Model integrating classical statistical techniques and machine learning algorithms for early detection of high-risk patients in community nursing settings. The proposed framework combines logistic regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Artificial Neural Networks with statistical feature selection techniques. Community health records containing demographic, clinical, behavioral, socioeconomic, and environmental variables are used for model development.

The model performance is evaluated using Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity, Precision, Recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC, and calibration statistics. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods such as SHAP values are incorporated to improve transparency and support nursing decision-making. The proposed model is expected to assist community nurses in identifying vulnerable patients earlier, prioritizing home visits, optimizing resource allocation, and improving preventive healthcare outcomes.

How to Cite this Paper

Kaser, P., Kashyap, N., Nair, M. & Kumar, S. P. (2026). Development of an AI-Based Statistical Clinical Decision Support Model for Early Detection of High-Risk Patients in Community Nursing. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(8), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i8.093

Kaser, Pranjal, et al.. "Development of an AI-Based Statistical Clinical Decision Support Model for Early Detection of High-Risk Patients in Community Nursing." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 8, 2026, pp. 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i8.093.

Kaser, Pranjal,Nishi Kashyap,Madhuri Nair, and Shraddha Kumar. "Development of an AI-Based Statistical Clinical Decision Support Model for Early Detection of High-Risk Patients in Community Nursing." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 8 (2026): 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i8.093.

Search & Index

References


  1. Alenazi, A. S., Alqahtani, F. M., & Alshammari, M. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence-powered clinical decision support systems in nursing: A systematic review. Saudi Journal of Medicine and Public Health, 1(2), 55–67.

  2. Barredo Arrieta, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., Herrera, F. (2020). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012

  3. Beam, A. L., & Kohane, I. S. (2018). Big data and machine learning in health care. JAMA, 319(13), 1317–1318. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.18391

  4. Bharati, S., Podder, P., & Mondal, M. R. H. (2023). Explainable AI for healthcare: A systematic review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56, 1–38.

  5. Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer.

  6. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.

  7. Buess, M., et al. (2025). From large language models to multimodal AI: A scoping review on the potential of generative AI in medicine. NPJ Digital Medicine.

  8. Chua, W. L., Rusli, K. D. B., & Aitken, L. M. (2024). Comparing early warning score, qSOFA and SIRS for sepsis prediction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 33(6), 2005–2018.

  9. Esteva, A., Robicquet, A., Ramsundar, B., et al. (2019). A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0316-z

  10. Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. The Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189–1232.

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: Aug 11 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top