IJCOPE Journal

UGC Logo DOI / ISO Logo

International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management

A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access International Journal Supporting Multidisciplinary Research, Digital Publishing Standards, DOI Registration, and Academic Indexing.
Journal Information
ISSN: 3108-1754 (Online)
Crossref DOI: Available
ISO Certification: 9001:2015
Publication Fee: 599/- INR
Compliance: UGC Journal Norms
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer Review: Double Blind
Volume 02, Issue 7

Published on: July 2026

NEO-POLITICAL PHYSICS: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING COMPLEXITY, POWER, AND GLOBAL GOVERNANCE IN TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY WORLD POLITICS

Dr Santosh Kumar Rout

Assistant Professor Of Political Science

Fakir Mohan Autonomous College, Balasore

Article Status

Plagiarism Passed Peer Reviewed Open Access

Available Documents

Abstract

The twenty-first century has witnessed unprecedented transformations in political systems driven by globalization, digital technologies, artificial intelligence (AI), climate change, transnational governance, cyber insecurity, and increasing geopolitical complexity. Conventional political theories such as Realism, Liberalism, Constructivism, and Institutionalism continue to provide valuable insights but often examine political phenomena through relatively specialized analytical lenses. Consequently, they face growing challenges in explaining the adaptive, interconnected, and nonlinear characteristics of contemporary governance.

This article introduces Neo-Political Physics (NPP) as an interdisciplinary conceptual framework that integrates Political Science with Complexity Science, Systems Theory, Network Science, Cybernetics, and Governance Studies. Rather than asserting that political systems literally follow the laws of physics, the framework employs carefully constructed analogies as heuristic devices for analysing political interaction, institutional adaptation, resilience, legitimacy, and global governance. The study adopts a qualitative theory-building methodology based on systematic conceptual analysis and interdisciplinary synthesis. It proposes original concepts including Political Gravity, Political Energy, Political Entropy, Political Momentum, Political Resonance, Political Adaptation, Political Equilibrium, and Political Resilience as analytical tools for understanding modern political dynamics.

 

The article argues that Neo-Political Physics complements existing political theories by offering an integrated framework capable of explaining increasingly complex governance systems. It further discusses the framework's theoretical contributions, policy relevance, methodological implications, and future directions for empirical validation.

How to Cite this Paper

Rout, D. S. K. (2026). Neo-Political Physics: An Interdisciplinary Framework for Understanding Complexity, Power, and Global Governance in Twenty-First Century World Politics. International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, <i>02</i>(7), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i7.228

Rout, Dr. "Neo-Political Physics: An Interdisciplinary Framework for Understanding Complexity, Power, and Global Governance in Twenty-First Century World Politics." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 02, no. 7, 2026, pp. 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i7.228.

Rout, Dr. "Neo-Political Physics: An Interdisciplinary Framework for Understanding Complexity, Power, and Global Governance in Twenty-First Century World Politics." International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management 02, no. 7 (2026): 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55041/ijcope.v2i7.228.

Search & Index

References

Barabási, A.-L. (2016). Network Science. Cambridge University Press.

Bertalanffy, L. von. (1968). General System Theory. George Braziller.

Easton, D. (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. Wiley.

Holland, J. H. (1992). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. MIT Press.

Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony. Princeton University Press.

Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2012). Power and Interdependence (4th ed.). Pearson.

Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in Systems. Chelsea Green.

Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics Among Nations. Alfred A. Knopf.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.

Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power. PublicAffairs.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons. Cambridge University Press.

Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press.

Simon, H. A. (1962). "The Architecture of Complexity." Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106(6), 467–482.

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley.

Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.

 

 

Ethical Compliance & Review Process

  • All submissions are screened under plagiarism detection.
  • Review follows editorial policy.
  • Authors retain copyright.
  • Peer Review Type: Double-Blind Peer Review
  • Published on: Jul 25 2026
CCBYNC

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution.

View License
Scroll to Top